Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Culture

Leading his star-studded cast of schnooks, Donald Trump is producing his very own ‘Springtime for Hitler’

After yet another indictment, life in Trumpworld is uncannily imitating Mel Brooks’ ‘Producers’

I began this past Tuesday the way I begin most days of late — turning to the news reports of a Donald Trump criminal or civil indictment. This week’s indictment was brought by the office of Fani Willis, the district attorney for Fulton County in Georgia. Trump, along with 18 advisers, lawyers, and supporters, was charged with running a “criminal enterprise” which tried to reverse the 2020 presidential election results.

As I skipped from one account to another of Trump’s foray into racketeering and defrauding, I had an uncanny feeling that I had already seen this movie. I don’t mean this as a metaphor for the previous indictments, but literally a movie: Mel Brooks’ The Producers.

Not, mind you, the slack 2005 remake with Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick. Instead, I had in mind the manic 1968 original with Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder. This was, funnily enough, the same year we elected another Republican to the White House who, thanks to the role he played in a criminal break-in and cover-up, was forced to move out six years later. Shortly after, his replacement announced that our “long national nightmare” was over.

Of course, the accuracy of that claim turned out to be questionable. What is beyond question, though, is that we are once again living through yet another long national nightmare, conjured by yet another Republican president who stands accused of orchestrating yet another cover-up of another series of crimes aimed at our democratic institutions. It’s as if the past half-century has been a nightmare from which we, like Stephen Dedalus in James Joyce’s Ulysses, are trying to wake up.

And what, you are wondering, does this hoary quotation have to do with The Producers and, well, “The Conspirators,” starring our former president (and current perp) Donald Trump? You should ask a fellow named Bloom. But not Leopold Bloom, Dedalus’ nocturnal companion in the alleys of Dublin (who had, oddly enough, been played by Mostel in the play Ulysses in Nighttown). Instead, ask Leo Bloom, the neurotic companion of Mostel’s Max Bialystock on the streets of New York.

Gene Wilder played Leo Bloom, but not the Bloom that James Joyce wrote about. Photo by Getty Images

Brooks was a fan, but not a scholar, of Joyce’s work. (Full disclosure: I never made it past page 7 of the novel.) “I don’t know what it meant to James Joyce,” he remarked, “but to me Leo Bloom always meant a vulnerable Jew with curly hair.” As for what the movie meant to him, Brooks was equally clear: it was about “two schnooks on Broadway who set out to produce a flop and swindle the backers.”

One schnook is Bloom, an accountant as bland as the beige coat he wears — except, that is, when he turns incandescent during his panic attacks. The other schnook, of course, is Bialystock, an aging theatrical producer with an expanding waistline and exotic combover — except that his remaining hair is black and not orange. His motto, famously, is “When you’ve got it, flaunt it.”

As fans of the movie know, when Bloom arrives at Bialystock’s office to audit his books, he discovers a $2,000 bookkeeping error in his favor. A desperate Bialystock, who was once reigned as “King of Broadway” and now fears the prospect of jail, begs Bloom to jigger the numbers. How hard could it be, he suggests, to “move a few decimal points around.”

Soon after the overwhelmed Bloom agrees to this minor instance of fraud, he has an epiphany. A theater producer, he tells Bialystock, whose face registers every nuance of the shift from astonishment to avarice, could make more money with a flop than he could with a hit. The key, he explains with a devilish smile, is “creative accounting.” Since the IRS audits box-office successes, not failures, a producer could, quite literally, make a steal by raking in investments large enough to dwarf the production costs. You could then make off with the sizable profit and, as Bialystock and Bloom intended, take off for Rio.

Or take back the White House.

This is where artistry merges uneasily with reality. Max Bialystock decides to defraud dozens of wealthy old ladies, like the one memorably played by Estelle “Touch me, feel me” Winwood, to fund his effort to make himself rich. On the other hand, Donald Trump, after a long career of defrauding customers and contractors, planned to defraud tens of millions of Americans not of their money, but instead of their votes, to make himself president again.

Mel Brooks poses with cast members of the London production of The Producers. Photo by Getty Images

In a word, Trump orchestrated a confederacy of schnooks to produce a successful coup only to see it flop. Whereas Bialystock gathered a collection of flaming lunatics who he believed would bring down the curtain on Springtime for Hitler by the end of the first act, Trump hired, in the words of one cast member, an “elite strike force team” which would, in the words of a second cast member, “release the Kraken,” while a third member dabbed frantically at make-up dripping down his sweat-dappled cheeks.

In the wings of Trump’s production there were not nostalgic Nazis like Franz Liebkind (played by the show-stopping Kenneth Mars), but instead neo-Nazis like the fine people who marched in Charlottesville. There were also unassuming and obscure individuals like the bespectacled Department of Justice lawyer Jeffrey Clark who, like the bespectacled and bland Leo Bloom, thought that teaming up with Trump would help him avenge the indifference the world had always shown him.

While the parallels go on, the coup did not. Trump and his 18 co-conspirators failed to bring the curtain down on democracy. And yet, The Producers leaves us laughing; “The Conspirators” not so much. It is too fantastic to believe that just as Max Bialystock, the former king of Broadway, ends up in prison, Donald Trump, the former president who would be king, will do so as well. The events of late 2022 and early 2023 may well prove to have been a dress rehearsal for the opening of Wintertime for America.

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.