Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Make a Passover gift and support Jewish journalism. DONATE NOW
Fast Forward

Is Trump’s Sleepy Eyes Jibe At Chuck Todd Anti-Semitic?

Is “sleepy eyes” Donald Trump’s latest anti-Semitic dog whistle to the white supremacists and neo-Nazis? That’s what the Washington Post is asking in a column after Trump tweeted the insult of Chuck Todd, the host of NBC’s “Meet the Press” program on Monday.

Trump is a famous user of belittling nicknames and monikers for rivals and media figures he criticize him. During the Republican presidential primary, he called Senator Ted Cruz “Lyin Ted” and called Senator Elizabeth Warren “Pocahontas.”

Trump has been calling Todd “sleepy eyes” since 2012, and has used the phrase both in public appearances as well as on Twitter. But on Monday, after Trump used it in criticizing Todd over a broadcast about North Korea some Twitter users pointed out that the nickname may be anti-Semitic.

The stereotype of Jews having sleepy eyes goes back to Nazi politician Julius Streicher, who used the trait in a children’s book about how to identify Jews. Now, websites that have pages devoted to identifying Jews often mention the trait, along with bushy eyebrows and a hooked nose.

Todd is Jewish, though it’s not clear if Trump is aware of the anti-Semitic history of the phrase.

“I doubt that Trump knows what he’s talking about. [‘Sleepy eyes’] was hardly a major feature of Nazi propaganda. It was not something that every German had to know,” Peter Kenez, a professor emeritus of the University of California-Santa Cruz and Holocaust survivor, told the Post. “I think it is too obscure. Our president has to have it to think up an adjective for everyone that he says something bad about. I suppose nothing else came to him.”

Contact Ari Feldman at [email protected] or on Twitter @aefeldman

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.