Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Make a Passover gift and support Jewish journalism. DONATE NOW
Politics

AIPAC fails its first test in the midterms

Despite heavy spending against former Rep. Tom Malinowski, he’s in a dead heat in the race for NJ’s open House seat

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee appeared to fall short in its first major test of the midterm elections. Former Democratic Rep. Tom Malinowski, a top target of the pro-Israel group’s super PAC, the United Democracy Project, and progressive candidate Analilia Mejia, backed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, were locked in a dead heat in the New Jersey special election for a House seat, according to unofficial results.

AIPAC spent more than $2 million in negative attacks against Malinowski, 60, in the crowded Democratic primary for the House seat vacated by New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill.

While AIPAC said it targeted Malinowski over his criticism of Israel, the TV ad it sponsored made no mention of the Jewish state. Instead, it highlighted his 2019 vote for a bipartisan border funding bill, which included an increase in funds for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency.

United Democracy Project was the top spender in the race for the northern New Jersey district, which includes a sizable Jewish electorate.

Whether or not Malinowski ultimately wins, AIPAC will have failed to achieve its goal of electing a Democrat in the primary who it views as being more supportive of Israel, either Essex County commissioner Brendan Gill or former lieutenant governor Tahesha Way. And if Mejia wins, AIPAC will have helped elect a progressive who is less supportive of Israel.

In a statement released Friday morning, United Democracy Project minimized the import of the contest, a special election ahead of a new race late this year. “The outcome in NJ-11 was an anticipated possibility, and our focus remains on who will serve the next full term in Congress,” it read. “UDP will be closely monitoring dozens of primary races, including the June NJ-11 primary, to help ensure pro-Israel candidates are elected to Congress.”

In the 2024 election cycle, the group spent $28 million in high-stakes Democratic primaries. That contributed to the defeat of Reps. Jamaal Bowman of New York and Cori Bush of Missouri, strident critics of Israel. Malinowski, who served two terms in Congress from 2019 to 2023, holds a mainstream Democratic stance on Israel. During his first term, he traveled to Israel on a trip sponsored by the American Israel Education Foundation, AIPAC’s educational affiliate.

AIPAC has become increasingly controversial among mainstream Democrats for backing pro-Israel Republicans who questioned the 2020 election results. That opposition deepened during the Gaza war as Democratic voters became more polarized over U.S. policy on Israel. Congressional candidates, including some Jewish Democrats, have promised not to take contributions from AIPAC. The group has also drawn attacks from white nationalists and some leaders of the MAGA movement for their lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, who backed Mejia in the race, said AIPAC’s attacks on Malinowski were “an attempt to wholesale intimidate the entire party.” Mejia accused Israel of committing genocide in the war against Hamas in Gaza, but AIPAC didn’t target her, as it similarly did not spend in 2024 to defeat Reps. Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib.

When AIPAC launched the attack ad against Malinowski last month, he suggested it would boomerang against them. “I have many pro-Israel supporters in the district, including AIPAC members, who believe you can be passionately pro-Israel while being critical of Netanyahu,” Malinowski said.

“To say that they’re appalled by this ad would be an understatement. In fact, I’m reading a collective sense that AIPAC has lost its mind.”

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.