The Anti-Trump Luxury Shopping Experience
Safety-pin chic is all the rage. Image by Getty Images
It has been my mission, the last few days, to urge those of us who are Trump opponents to get our priorities straight. I’ve urged casting a wide net for ‘allies’ in this, the new resistance. I’ve wanted us all to set ideological differences and political purity requirements aside. Are you a #NeverTrump Republican? A Bernie die-hard who wrote a 100,000,000-word social-media post about why, even though she’s the worst person to ever live, you’ll hold your nose and vote for #Her? Are you a Trump voter with buyer’s remorse? Fine by me!
However. A Vogue article, which I found via Andi Zeisler’s Twitter, just slightly tested my resolve. The article, “10 Ways to Wear Safety Pins Post-Election and Show Your Support,” puts a monetizing spin on an anti-fascist gesture that’s already gotten called out (unfairly I think) for being too weak of a gesture and a sign of white obliviousness. (Anecdote time: The only person I’ve seen on the street in New York post-election wearing a ton of safety pins with a not-otherwise-punk look has been a black woman.)
The Vogue piece is an awkward mix of protest-reporting (“[H]ere in the U.S., the trend has picked up in a similar response to President-elect Donald Trump’s views on immigration—from deportation to building that wall.”) and… an attempt at monetizing protest. Readers are instructed to purchase items from an accompanying slideshow (sample item: “Mugler cotton pullover with safety pins, $569”), “then put your money where your mouth is and take real action against the forces of hate.” Zeisler hits the platinum-incrusted nail on the head: This is money that, if you’re concerned, could be donated.
While I do take Zeisler’s point, I’m going to try, once again, to maintain my resolve. Yes, gold safety pin is hilarious in an Edina Monsoon sort of way. But it’s oh so much better than a gold Ivanka bracelet. In a society where everything’s a shopping opportunity, I’d rather see the disposable-income (or irresponsible-spending) set gesturing at anti-racism than the reverse. I’d rather see a jazzed-up safety pin whose profits go to an anti-racist or pro-immigrant charity, but at least no one’s pretending these are that?
Except… and here’s where I’m sort of with Zeisler on this. Yes, the haute-safety-pin-as-political-gesture wearers (if there are any) are On The Right Side, but it’s not the greatest if anti-racism gets marketed as a high-end brand. It’s arguably more alienating than a Clinton surrogate who plays a broke-but-not-poor millennial on HBO. And I’m not familiar enough with Vogue readers’ budgets to say whether these luxe safety pins would be in addition to generous donations, or whether this is a post whose takeaway is, forget the ACLU, just look the part.
Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. Her book, The Perils of “Privilege”, will be published by St. Martin’s Press in March 2017.
A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.
If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
