Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Life

Is United Airlines’ Leggings Ban Like Knesset Dress Code — Only Worse?

Dress codes: Not just for the Knesset, it appears.

Girls traveling yesterday on a United Airlines flight were asked to change into something a little less comfortable. The story — which broke following a tweetstorm by Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America founder Shannon Watts — involves some young girls, exact age unclear, getting turned away while trying to board a domestic flight while wearing… leggings. As it turns out, the girls were traveling on a free pass intended for employees and dependents, which involves a dress code. A dress code without, evidently, much relationship to what girls in 2017 wear while traveling, or even necessarily have in their wardrobes. Leggings are what many — most? — women and girls wear these days, especially when traveling. And as anyone who’s shopped for women’s jeans in the last decade or so can attest, finding pants that aren’t leggings-like is if anything the greater challenge.

There are, I think it’s fair to say, plenty of contexts where the existence of a dress code isn’t inherently sexist. Regardless of gender, corporate lawyers — and Hasidic Jews — aren’t heading to work in yoga pants. Life is not a leggings free-for-all for all of us, at all times, and if United wants infants of all genders in business casual, so be it.

But definitions of appropriate dress for women (and, more upsettingly, young girls) tend to have a built-in shame component. A man dressed wrong for a particular setting — or whose clothing is more snug than ideal — isn’t generally presumed to have seductive intent. Whereas if a woman’s skirt is short or top low-cut, this gets read as a message, even if (as is so often the case) the item in question was purchased several dress sizes ago ago, or shrunk in the wash. Not infrequently, the very same outfit gets to count as appropriate on one girl or woman, but not on another, simply because of a difference in build. For these reasons — and especially because children are involved — I’d urge United to give leggings-wearers a pass, even if they’re kids traveling on a pass.

Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. She is the author of “The Perils Of ‘Privilege’”, from St. Martin’s Press. Follow her on Twitter, @tweetertation

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.