A mother embraces her child in San Bernardino, California, following a school shooting. Image by Getty Images

Two stories dominated my feeds yesterday, and by two I mean mostly one: United Airlines managed to cause even more outrage than it had with its leggings ban, this time by having a man physically dragged off one of its planes after he’d refused to volunteer to leave the overbooked aircraft. Everything about the story was horrifying, as anyone who watched the viral video can likely attest.

Then there was that other story: In San Bernardino, California, reports the Los Angeles Times, a man named Cedric Anderson shot and killed his wife Karen Elaine Smith, then himself. Smith was a special education teacher, and because the husband showed up to commit this act at his wife’s workplace, he also wound up shooting and killing an 8-year-old and wounding a 9-year-old. According to Smith’s mother, she’d been planning to divorce her husband. The most chilling detail of all might be San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan’s explanation of how Anderson was able to enter the workplace: “‘That’s not uncommon for a spouse to be able to gain access to a campus to meet with their spouse.’” Because family is safe, or, in an ideal world, would be.

I juxtapose these two stories not to shame anyone who found the former more noteworthy than the latter. It was more worthy of note! The United story was both deeply upsetting and utterly bizarre, and (as the bloody-faced flyer’s image attests) involved physical violence. My point is precisely that there’s nothing remotely surprising about the latter story. Not the gun violence, not the domestic violence angle, and not the fact of a child being shot dead at school.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

There’s an impulse, when confronted with two such stories, to use the more startling one as an opportunity to address underlying problems, and to respond to the latter with a resigned shrug. It’s the shrug that I have issues with.

Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. She is the author of “The Perils Of ‘Privilege’”, from St. Martin’s Press. Follow her on Twitter, @tweetertation

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

2X match on all Passover gifts!

$90 → $180 $180 → $360

$360 → $720

Other amount