Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Make a matched gift and support Jewish journalism. DONATE NOW
Forward 50 2014

Darren Aronofsky

On paper, filmmaker Darren Aronofsky making a biblical blockbuster seemed inevitable. Hollywood’s obsession with the Bible is well established, and Aronofsky’s movies had steadily been growing in budget and ambition: His 2006 work, “The Fountain,” elegantly played with themes of love and existence unfolding over millennia, and 2010’s “Black Swan” grossed more than $300 million worldwide.

Producers for this year’s film “Noah” could also note that profits from the 2008 film “The Wrestler” had showed that the 45-year-old director had added bankability to his proven skill in garnering a cult audience and critical acclaim. However, since his early films “Pi” and “Requiem for a Dream,” Aronofsky’s intense, unsettling style has been at odds with Hollywood-friendly genre movies.

This year, Aronofsky wrote, produced and directed “Noah,” a heroic reimagining of the biblical flood. Russell Crowe starred as the title character, and was joined by Emma Watson, Jennifer Connelly and Anthony Hopkins. The film, with its epic battles and special effects, was a departure both from Aronofsky’s earlier works and the sparsely told biblical account of Noah.

Some religious leaders denounced “Noah,” generating controversy. Critics, too, were divided on its worth, but agreed that it offered an original interpretation of the story with the touch of a true artist. As well as grossing more than $300 million worldwide, it opened up a vigorous dialogue about how art should interpret the Bible.

With the success of “Noah,” Aronofsky has joined the ranks of household directors. Two blockbuster films do not guarantee success — but for Aronofsky, the future seems bright after the flood.

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news. All donations are still being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000 until April 24.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.