Image by getty images

Those of us who believe that the framework agreement between Iran and the United States and five other nations represents, on balance, serious progress in preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East were thrown off-balance by the recent remarks of Iran’s supreme leader.

Whether Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s bellicose assertions were tactical moves aimed at his domestic audience, or a genuine expression of Iran’s final negotiating position will help determine whether this historic gamble results in an actual deal by the June 30 deadline.

Those who were never inclined to believe anything positive could come of these nuclear negotiations no doubt felt vindicated when Khamenei challenged the two pillars of the American approach in an April 9 speech. He said that all the harsh economic sanctions devastating his country would have to be lifted on the very day any final agreement would be signed. And he seemed to rule out any international inspections of military bases or compounds.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

Well, that didn’t take long, the critics crowed. President Obama’s pledges that sanctions would be lifted only gradually, to reward Iran’s behavior, and that vigorous inspections would ensure compliance would be for naught if the supreme ruler decides to rule supreme.

But these positions are not new for Khamenei, and they are not shared by the more accommodating factions in Tehran who view a final agreement as the best chance to end Iran’s economic and political isolation. (The speaker of Iran’s parliament and the head of the Revolutionary Guards, for example, voiced support of the agreement).

Just as powerful interests in the U.S. are doing their best to quash this deal, Iranian leaders are clearly engaging in their own form of political jockeying.

Khamenei’s remarks make the difficult task of finalizing this deal more daunting. While the details of this complex negotiation are best left to the experts, we strongly believe that these two subjects — sanctions and inspections — ought not to be severely compromised. International sanctions drove Iran to the bargaining table in the first place, and some must remain in place as a guarantee of compliance. Likewise, to dramatically weaken inspections provides no assurance that the nuclear infrastructure left in place won’t be used for the wrong reasons.

Khamenei’s remarks cannot be discounted. Nor should they be allowed to impede this consequential diplomatic process.

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism you rely on. Make a gift today!

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

$90 $180

$360

Other amount