Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe
The Schmooze

Simon Dubnow at 150

He was a proud Russian, a renegade Orthodox Jew, an ardent advocate of Jewish autonomy, and the man who pioneered the field of Jewish historiography at the turn of the 20th century. Yet Simon Dubnow continues to inspire Jewish scholarship today, as evidenced by a day-long conference at the YIVO institute for Jewish Research on October 24, marking the 150th anniversary of Dubnow’s birth.

Scholars at the conference presented talks on the many facets of this legendary and complex thinker, examining Dubnow’s scholarship on Hasidism, his reaction to Russian anti-Semitism, his attitude towards the Haskalah movement, and his relationship with YIVO.

For Dubnow, who had broken with the “Old Judaism” of his youth by the time he had reached bar mitzvah age, traditional Judaism never entirely lost its appeal. Instead of utterly abandoning the religious observance he had been raised with, he sought an “integration of the soul” as professor Robert Seltzer put it, which would amalgamate the “Old Judaism” with secular, European and especially Russian thinking to create a “New Judaism.”

Professor Brian Horowitz pointed out that, although a non-believer, Dubnow maintained that the Jews are in fact chosen — though not by God. Instead, he saw their chosenness in their unique “historical journey” whose ultimate goal is “transcendence.”

“Indeed, Dubnow thought that both the extreme freethinkers and the Orthodox were similarly mistaken in that they saw religion as a “defining aspect of Jewish identity,” noted Brian Smollett.

In his presentation on Dubnow’s fascination with Hasidism, Professor Yohanan Petrovsky-Shtern drew attention to parallels between Dubnow’s depictions of early Hasidism and those of early Christianity by the famous historian Ernest Renan. Both saw their subjects as fighting against a dead religion, a Judiasm of “deeds without faith.” To Dubnow, said Petrovsky-Shtern, early Hasidism represented a populist movement with a utopian vision.

While Dubnow’s historiography is now considered largely outdated, his work contributed to a Jewish national consciousness during a particularly volatile period in Jewish history. And this, in the end, may have been his most important contribution of all.

Engage

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.