Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
The Schmooze

Joseph Gordon-Levitt vs. GQ

Yesterday Joseph Gordon-Levitt — the kid from “Third Rock from the Sun” who has matured into adult stardom with films like “Inception“and his own open source production company — wrote a rebuttal to a recent GQ profile of him. “I’m writing this because I have a problem with what their article says about my brother,” he said on his Tumblr site. “I’ll be honest, it really made me feel terrible.”

He went on to explain his displeasure: “The ‘allegations’ to which she must be referring were made by a handful of gossip websites. They are factually incorrect according to the coroner’s office and the police department. I don’t like publicly speaking about my brother’s death, but I’m making an exception to correct this irresponsible claim.”

The lines in question are three sentences near the end of the piece. Gordon-Levitt is discussing his production company, Hit RECord, which he founded with his older brother, Dan. Dan passed away in 2010, but the cause of death was never confirmed. Amy Wallace, author of the article, explained that there were “allegations” of a drug overdose and that “Joe” (as he prefers to be called) will only say “it was an accident.”

Wallace handled this issue with, if not grace, then at least delicacy. It would have been impossible for her to ignore the death; it was too important to her subject’s life. And, with only three sentences, she didn’t press the matter, either. The profile was about Joe, not his brother, never mind the fact that he indeed lived an interesting, story-worthy life.

Amy Wallace has written for publications from The New Yorker to Reader’s Digest. She has two staff-wide Pulitzer Prizes for coverage of the L.A. riots and the Northridge earthquake. Her work has been widely anthologized. It seems unlikely that she’d deliberately misrepresent the life of her subject. Still, if the factual accuracy of any part of the profile is in question, Wallace (or the magazine) would do well to follow up with some sort of qualification.

Perhaps Gordon-Levitt was unimpressed by the overall tone of the piece. Wallace doesn’t hold much back: “During our day together, I definitely saw remnants of that hyperanalytical, smarty-pants (dare I say ivory-tower douchebaggy?) quality,” she writes.

GQ has not responded to Gordon-Levitt’s statement.

Engage

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.