Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe
The Schmooze

Audiences Are Rejecting Darren Aronofsky’s New Psychological Thriller

Described by Paramount Studios as a “riveting psychological thriller about love, devotion and sacrifice”, critics have been eagerly awaiting Darren Aronofsky’s latest directorial feature “mother!” since the drop of its stark and surrealist trailer, featuring a perpetually terrified Jennifer Lawrence. The movie’s weak opening weekend, however, suggests that audiences have decided they don’t want to witness (spoiler alert!) an excited mob full of poetry fans tearing a newborn baby limb from limb.

After receiving an F on the popular movie rating website Cinemascore directly following its Friday premiere, “mother!” brought in a mere $7.5 million in revenue, Lawrence’s worst opening weekend ever and not so hot for Aronofsky, either (for context, “The Emoji Movie” brought in $25 million over the same period and scored a B on Cinemascore).

Aronofsky, who perhaps should have retired at the top after directing the graphic love scene between Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis in “Black Swan,” has never been considered a “safe” filmmaker. Between “Black Swan,” “Requiem for a Dream,” and “The Wrestler,” Aronofsky’s filmography is responsible for the majority of adult nightmares that occurred between 2000 and 2010. “Mother!”, however, may have finally crossed the line between “psychologically disturbing” and “cannibal cop meets Dr. Strangelove.”

Critically (which is to say, among those who we as a society have decided are professional moviegoers based usually on the fact that their moms have connections at New York Magazine), “mother!” has gotten mixed reviews, with one reviewer calling it “brilliantly deranged” and another declaring that “if you gave an extremely bright fifteen-year-old a bag of unfamiliar herbs to smoke, and forty million dollars or so to play with, “Mother!” would be the result.”

Unfortunately for Aronofsky, sometimes the moviegoing commoners decide they don’t care what the New York Times thinks and choose to see “It” four times in theaters instead of paying money to watch a movie where the main characters are named mother, Him, man, and woman.

The Paramount president of marketing and distribution, Megan Colligan, defended the movie on behalf of the studio, calling it “very audacious and brave”:

You are talking about a director at the top of his game, and an actress at the top her game. They made a movie that was intended to be bold. Everyone wants original filmmaking, and everyone celebrates Netflix when they tell a story no one else wants to tell. This is our version. We don’t want all movies to be safe. And it’s okay if some people don’t like it.

Whether or not you personally enjoy biblical allegories about poets with writers block, the moviegoing public has spoken: “mother!” can not sit with them. Instead, after a summer full of box office flops, Hollywood would do well to focus on the movie themes that worked well this year: serial killing clowns, Queen Latifah attending college reunions, and female superheroes.

Becky Scott is the editor of The Schmooze. Follow her on Twitter, @arr_scott

Engage

  • SHARE YOUR FEEDBACK

  • UPCOMING EVENT

    SKY & SCULPTURE

    Hybrid: Online and at the Marlene Meyerson JCC Manhattan

    Oct 2, 2022

    6:30 pm ET · 

    A Sukkah, IMKHA, created by artist Tobi Kahn, for the Marlene Meyerson JCC of Manhattan is an installation consisting of 13 interrelated sculpted painted wooden panels, constituting a single work of art. Join for a panel discussion with Rabbi Joanna Samuels, Chief Executive Director of the Marlene Meyerson JCC of Manhattan, Talya Zax, Innovation Editor of the Forward, and Tobi Kahn, Artist. Moderated by Mattie Kahn.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.