Audiences Are Rejecting Darren Aronofsky’s New Psychological Thriller by the Forward

Audiences Are Rejecting Darren Aronofsky’s New Psychological Thriller

Described by Paramount Studios as a “riveting psychological thriller about love, devotion and sacrifice”, critics have been eagerly awaiting Darren Aronofsky’s latest directorial feature “mother!” since the drop of its stark and surrealist trailer, featuring a perpetually terrified Jennifer Lawrence. The movie’s weak opening weekend, however, suggests that audiences have decided they don’t want to witness (spoiler alert!) an excited mob full of poetry fans tearing a newborn baby limb from limb.

After receiving an F on the popular movie rating website Cinemascore directly following its Friday premiere, “mother!” brought in a mere $7.5 million in revenue, Lawrence’s worst opening weekend ever and not so hot for Aronofsky, either (for context, “The Emoji Movie” brought in $25 million over the same period and scored a B on Cinemascore).

Aronofsky, who perhaps should have retired at the top after directing the graphic love scene between Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis in “Black Swan,” has never been considered a “safe” filmmaker. Between “Black Swan,” “Requiem for a Dream,” and “The Wrestler,” Aronofsky’s filmography is responsible for the majority of adult nightmares that occurred between 2000 and 2010. “Mother!”, however, may have finally crossed the line between “psychologically disturbing” and “cannibal cop meets Dr. Strangelove.”

Critically (which is to say, among those who we as a society have decided are professional moviegoers based usually on the fact that their moms have connections at New York Magazine), “mother!” has gotten mixed reviews, with one reviewer calling it “brilliantly deranged” and another declaring that “if you gave an extremely bright fifteen-year-old a bag of unfamiliar herbs to smoke, and forty million dollars or so to play with, “Mother!” would be the result.”

Unfortunately for Aronofsky, sometimes the moviegoing commoners decide they don’t care what the New York Times thinks and choose to see “It” four times in theaters instead of paying money to watch a movie where the main characters are named mother, Him, man, and woman.

The Paramount president of marketing and distribution, Megan Colligan, defended the movie on behalf of the studio, calling it “very audacious and brave”:

Whether or not you personally enjoy biblical allegories about poets with writers block, the moviegoing public has spoken: “mother!” can not sit with them. Instead, after a summer full of box office flops, Hollywood would do well to focus on the movie themes that worked well this year: serial killing clowns, Queen Latifah attending college reunions, and female superheroes.

Becky Scott is the editor of The Schmooze. Follow her on Twitter, @arr_scott


Darren Aronofsky’s New Movie Is Doing Really Poorly

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Audiences Are Rejecting Darren Aronofsky’s New Psychological Thriller

Thank you!

This article has been sent!