Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
The Schmooze

Expert Questions Lena Dunham’s Decision To Get A Hysterectomy

At least one expert says the hysterectomy Lena Dunham opted to get for her endometriosis was highly unusual.This opinion was issued in response to the touching essay Dunham wrote this week about seeking out a hysterectomy for her endometriosis.

The Cut spoke to Dr. Kathy Huang, the director of the Endometriosis Center at NYU Langone Medical Center, who said she never recommends getting a hysterectomy for endometriosis.

“First of all, you should never get a hysterectomy for endometriosis,” she told The Cut. “I’m going to start with that. That’s not actually the definitive treatment. A hysterectomy just removes the uterus. It doesn’t actually fix the endometriosis, because those lesions are outside of the uterus.”

Huang said the only circumstance in which you would want to get a hysterectomy would be in the case of adenomyosis, when endometrial tissue, which normally lines the uterus, grows into the muscular wall of the uterus.

Of course, Huang acknowledges that she doesn’t know the details of Lena Dunham’s medical history, nor is she familiar with the medical advice she received or did not receive.

“I think the frustrating part about this for me is that I don’t know if she was well-informed,” said Wang. “Although she must be right? She’s Lena Dunham … I would highly encourage women who are offered hysterectomies for endometriosis to seek second opinions.”

Although Dunham’s essay was relatable, heartbreaking, and inspiring, it’s important that women who read it going through similar medical situations don’t jump into seeking out treatment that might be unnecessary or dangerous.

Becky Scott is the editor of The Schmooze. Follow her on Twitter, @arr_scott

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.