Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
The Schmooze

Are Zac Efron’s Dreadlocks Harmless or Racist?

Zac Efron, before the dreads. Image by Getty Images

Normally beloved performer Zac Efron found himself in a hairy spot yesterday — controversy struck when Efron debuted a new dreadlocked hairdo on Instagram with the caption “just for fun.”

Just for fun ?

A post shared by Zac Efron (@zacefron) on

The seemingly innocuous black and white photo of the “Greatest Showman” actor has a serious racial undertone — dreadlocks are a traditional staple of black fashion, thought to date back to ancient times. Sure, it’s just a hair style, but it’s a hairstyle with major political ramifications — black dread wearers have historically fought against discrimination over the style. As recently as 2015 film star Zendaya was essentially called smelly by a reporter on the Oscars red carpet for sporting dreads.

So to see white people, however well intentioned, cheerfully borrowing a style that black people are still punished for, feels to many like cultural appropriation. To others, it feels more like cultural appreciation.

Efron’s post has sparked a comment fire, with many weighing in leaving comments like: “Okay to wear your hair however you want? You know here’s black people getting turned down on job interviews for wearing locks and braids right? Amazing how you whites don’t see discrimination until it happens to y’all.” Others protested that it’s “Just a hairstyle” and that criticism of Efron’s dreads was racism towards whites. A third group of people commented along the lines of: “Don’t think it’s racist or anything, but like he’s so not pulling this look off. What the hell.”

Jenny Singer is the deputy lifestyle editor for the Forward. You can reach her at [email protected] or on Twitter @jeanvaljenny

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.