Washington — Ehud Barak says Iran is not an “existential threat” to Israel.
In an interview with the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronoth, the Israeli defense minister was quoted as saying that “Iran does not constitute an existential threat against Israel” and that “I am not among those who believe Iran is an existential issue for Israel.” He was responding to a question about Iran’s nuclear program.
“Israel is strong, I don’t see anyone who could pose an existential threat,” said Barak, who added that he did view Iran as a challenge to the whole world.
Israeli leaders have previously portrayed Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons as a threat to Israel’s future.
The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.
Copyright © 2013, Forward Association, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Reconsider Decision on Rabbis and Intermarriage
Is Steven Hawking’s Decision To Boycott Israel a Boon to BDS?
Forced Out by Nazis, Grandmother Returns With Family to Germany
Tracing the Jewish Origins of the Holy Ghost
Mother of Jewish Teen Killed on Brooklyn Bridge Speaks Out
You've successfully signed up!
Barak is correct. Nothing can stand in our way of building nuclear weapons. We will thus prove our superiority over Sunni Islam because we will be able to deal with the zionists more decisively
Barack is relying on Israeli nuclear deterrence capabilities built way before 1970's. Israel has nothing to fear from a possible future Iranian nuclear weapon. If Cold War is any guide, mutual assured destruction will work. Iranian "madness" or "irrationaliy" seems like an orientalist conception on the nature of "Easterners".