Image by Associated Press

The Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday by Sholom Rubashkin, the former chief executive of a kosher meat packing plant in Iowa who was sentenced to 27 years in prison on charges of financial fraud.

Image by Associated Press

Without comment, the high court refused to consider whether Sholom Rubashkin’s sentence was excessive for a first-time, nonviolent offender and whether he was entitled to a new trial based on evidence of alleged judicial misconduct in the case.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

The rejection could mark the last step in a four-year legal saga that began in May 2008 when federal authorities raided the Agriprocessors kosher meatpacking plant in Postville, Iowa.

The Forward first reported on employee and animal welfare problems at Agriprocessors in 2006. Rubashkin, the CEO of Agriprocessors, was convicted in 2009 of 86 counts of financial fraud.

A member of the Lubavitch Hasidic sect, Rubashkin became a cause célèbre in the Orthodox community after his conviction. Orthodox Jews rallied on his behalf, organized an online petition drive in his support that received over 50,000 signatures, and have produced a handful of flashy videos arguing his case.

The push for a Supreme Court hearing on Rubashkin’s appeal drew support from outside the Orthodox community, however. In a blog post on Slate, journalist Emily Bazelon wrote that the “oddities of the case don’t sit well.”

In a recent highly polished video (see below), a handful of legal experts raised concerns about the handling of Rubashkin’s first trial.

On appeal, Rubashkin argued that he was entitled to a new trial after documents obtained through a freedom of information request allegedly revealed that the trial judge had been involved in planning the government raid. The 8th U.S. Circuit of Appeals in St. Louis had rejected Rubashkin’s request in 2011.

The Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the case came on the first day of Sukkot, a Jewish holiday when most of the key players in the case were not available for comment. Paul Clement, Rubashkin’s attorney, was not immediately available for comment.

Numerous groups submitted amicus briefs in support of Rubashkin, including 86 former attorneys general, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and a group of 40 legal ethics professors.

The case is Rubashkin v. USA, No. 11-1203.

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism you rely on. Make a gift today!

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

$90 $180

$360

Other amount