Why You Shouldn't Call Mel Bochner a Lox Jock

Language Artist Enjoys Retrospective at Jewish Museum

Wordsmith: Mel Bochner’s ‘Language Is Not Transparent’ from his ‘Strong Language’ retrospective, on view at the Jewish Museum in New York through October 12.
Courtesy of the Jewish Museum
Wordsmith: Mel Bochner’s ‘Language Is Not Transparent’ from his ‘Strong Language’ retrospective, on view at the Jewish Museum in New York through October 12.

By Lauren Davidson

Published May 19, 2014, issue of May 23, 2014.
  • Print
  • Share Share

From King Solomon to Ludwig Wittgenstein — with the notable exception of Moses — Jews have always been people of words. It seems appropriate, therefore, that the artist Mel Bochner’s new exhibition at the Jewish Museum, a retrospective of decades’ worth of his work and his first major museum show in New York City, is all about the power of language.

Bochner has long been fascinated with the visual representation of words and colors — essentially, with the association between what we say and what we mean, or what we intend and what is perceived. That relationship, and Bochner’s thesis, is best summed up by the maxim “Language is not transparent,” reflecting that words do not have meaning in and of themselves but contain only the power we ascribe to them, and that a word can never fully represent the object it describes.

For example, several of Bochner’s paintings feature a list of synonyms painted in bright, gaudy colors. On an eponymous painting, the word “nothing” kicks off a string of words, snaking “non-existence,” “obsolete,” “a rat’s ass,” “kaput,” and others in a rainbow of hues across a black 45-by-60-inch canvas. The words all mean the same thing, and yet none of them express precisely the same sentiment — except, perhaps, the irony of a tangible, visible word meaning nothing, which itself is a something. A similar painting meanders from “contempt” through dozens of words including “malice,” “ridicule,” “sharp tongue,” and “hate your guts,” in a linguistic journey that lumps together the eloquent and the colloquial.

Bochner says the paintings are inspired by Roget’s Thesaurus. A few years ago, he noticed that the book was a lot thicker than it used to be. “I was amazed at the kind of language that was now accepted as permissible for kids to see, for example. And I thought that marked a really huge shift in the politics of language,” he said.

The paintings are fun — the letters resemble children’s alphabet fridge magnets — and yet there’s a sinister sense of misdirection that comes from wrapping these profanities in bubblegum pink, sherbet yellow, and cotton candy blue.

“I actually think those are very dark paintings,” Bochner said, leaning back in his chair in an office on the top floor of the Jewish Museum. Dressed all in black, Bochner pushed back his thick gray hair, which coupled with his tall, firm stature knocks decades off his 74 years.

The exhibition’s title, “Mel Bochner: Strong Language,” points both to the obscene words Bochner uses in his paintings and, on a larger scale, to the mighty power that language holds. Both ideas resonate particularly within a Jewish context, where the spoken and written word have created and sustained Jewish communities through centuries but also subjected its followers to ongoing persecution at the hands of rabble-rousing political leaders and slur-slinging anti-Semites.

An experience with the latter inspired Bochner to paint “Jew.” While wandering around in cyberspace in 2008, Bochner stumbled across an anti-Semitic website that had a list of “some ways that you can insult Jews,” as he puts it. So he decided to paint them in his usual style, scrawling increasingly offensive words from “hebe” and “yiddle” to “kike,” hook-nose” and “Christ-killer” in yellow letters on a gray background — colors intentionally evocative of the Star of David Jews wore on their clothes in Nazi Germany.

The online list was “missing some good ones, like ‘hymie,’ but then they had other ones that are so ridiculous, like ‘lox jock.’ Where does that come from? In what context would you confront a person and call them a lox jock?” Bochner said. “But it’s the way it ends up, which is what the whole thing is about: the source of anti-Semitism, which is alive and well and living in language.”

Norman Kleeblatt, chief curator of the Jewish Museum, told the Forward that he and his colleagues “thought long and hard” about whether to show “Jew.” In the end, they designed the exhibition so that, even though “Jew” is displayed, the viewer turns away from the painting and is confronted, rather overpoweringly, with “The Joys of Yiddish,” a much bigger painting that uses brighter yellow and a bolder background to run its tongue over some of Yiddish’s most delectable terms: “kvetcher,” “shlimazel,” “meshugener.” A large-scale version of the painting is also currently installed on top of the Haus der Kunst, a triumphant crown atop Hitler’s propagandist museum in Munich.

Bochner thought up “The Joys of Yiddish” when he was commissioned to produce an outdoor installation for a construction barricade while Chicago’s Spertus Institute for Jewish Learning and Leadership was being rebuilt. He was one of three artists asked to contribute to the exhibit, called “The Language Barrier.”

The painting “was based on my own experience with my grandparents and my parents, that for Jews of a certain generation or period the language barrier was Yiddish. They spoke Yiddish, and everyone else spoke English,” Bochner said.

Although Bochner is loath to interpret his own work publicly, he admits that his Jewish upbringing probably influenced the development of his art. The son of European immigrants, Bochner was raised “in a very traditional family”; he attended Hebrew school and had a bar mitzvah.

“People [bring up] the Talmud, and the fact that Judaism seems to survive on language, so yes, I’m sure all of that had an effect on me,” Bochner said.

The Jewish Museum itself was instrumental in furthering Bochner’s artistic career. When he moved to New York 50 years ago, Bochner landed a job there as a security guard — during which a chance meeting would trigger a chain of events that would propel him to success — until he got fired for taking a nap behind a Louise Nevelson sculpture. That Bochner should return to the museum with his own retrospective of word-based works after a first gig there that mostly involved silence provides a satisfying sense of symmetry.

But Bochner puts that down to coincidence. “The building bears no resemblance to the museum from the ’60s, so there’s no spatial nostalgia,” he said. “I don’t even know where the bathroom is here anymore.”

Lauren Davidson is a frequent contributor to the Forward.

Mel Bochner: Strong Language” is on view at the Jewish Museum through October 12

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.