Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Art

In a Jewish Bestiary, lions, leviathans and bears — oh my!

Did you know frogs are scholars of Torah, the Leviathan was God’s favorite pet and gazelles were the carrier pigeons of ancient Judea?

From the time Adam named the animals, the Jewish imagination has been preoccupied with creatures of the sea and creeping things of the land, referring to them in proverbs and deploying them as metaphors for enemy hordes and Israel itself. But the tradition of the bestiary is overwhelmingly a Christian one — at least it was until Mark Podwal tried his hand at a book of beasts.

First published in 1984, and now reissued in a full-color edition, Podwal’s “A Jewish Bestiary” aims to create illustrations according to a “strict Jewish context.” That means disposing of some precedent — not only the obvious antisemitism of some Christian bestiaries, where Jews are likened to owls hidden in darkness, but even popular imagery borrowed from Gentile neighbors. The results are unfailingly intriguing.

The Azazel Goat was a traditional offering on Yom Kippur bearing the sins of Israel and sacrificed to Azazel. Debate exists over what or who Azazel is. Ibn Ezra and Nachmanides argue it was a goat demon. Rashi was of the opinion that it was a cliff so high and steep that the goat would shatter halfway through its fall.

The Azazel Goat was a traditional offering on Yom Kippur which bore the sins of the people of Israel and sacrificed to Azazel. Debate exists over what or who Azazel is. Ibn Ezra and Nachmanides argue it was a goat demon. Rashi was of the opinion that it was a cliff so high and steep that the goat would shatter halfway through its fall. Image by Mark Podwal

The book, which contains 35 creatures from the wise, industrious ant to the Ziz, the impossibly large bird of legend, draws from a wide variety of sources both biblical and Talmudic in describing the qualities of these animals. Podwal teaches how the unicorn lent its hide to the tabernacle, how the gnat gnawed away at Titus’ brain and how the serpent was once bipedal — prior to that whole Tree of Knowledge imbroglio.

The pleasure of Podwal’s compendium lies as much, if not moreso, in the text as in the artwork. Taken together, they hint at an ecosystem where the phoenix’s screech wakes the cock, the Leviathan nearly devours the fish that swallows Jonah and where a sagely frog, seen by the prophet Yarhina’ah, transports a scorpion to a man marked for death. Those curious about a forthcoming Messianic feast may be interested to learn that the Ziz, Behemoth and Leviathan are all on the bill of fare. (The Ziz was of particular interest to me; described as the “ultimate delicacy,” Moses will cut it a la the Grinch and the roast beast and, like the Shmoos of “Li’l Abner,” the bird will taste a bit like everything.)

So wonderful is the bestiary’s lore that the images can be underwhelming. It’s a bit of a letdown to read of the Leviathan “which usually eats a whale daily” or the Behemoth, that “had to be prevented from multiplying” lest it devour the whole world, and see Podwal painting them as familiar — if supersized — animals. Given the fact that so much of a conventional bestiary’s joy lies in its mistakes and misconceptions — the second- or third-hand rendering of a creature the artist likely never saw — it’s a shame that Podwal did not indulge that same fantastical ignorance. The Behemoth may have been a hippo, but do we have to draw it that way? And why can’t we see the snake with legs?

Podwal’s Leviathan, while huge, doesn’t quite evoke the terror of the sharp-toothed beast who “makes the sea boil like an ointment pot.” Image by Marc Podwal

That’s not to say that Podwal, now 76, renowned for his art in The New York Times and no stranger to Jewish subjects, doesn’t deliver inventive illustrations that gesture at the Jewish conception of familiar creatures.

The pious stork wears tefillin. The crab is dappled with Hebrew letters. A frog clutches a yad, or Torah pointer. Perhaps my favorite drawing, cunningly rendering a complex idea, is the picture of the swine.

Always someone's quarry, Podwal tells us, the Jewish people have a long history of being depicted as hares. This image, modelled after a painting from the wooden synagogue in Chodorow, Ukraine depicts the double-headed Eagle from the Russian Coat of Arms, grasping a hare in its talons. While paired with a seemingly complimentary verse from Deuteronomy, the image not so secretly implies a predatory dynamic between Jews and the Empire.

Always someone’s quarry, Podwal tells us, the Jewish people have a long history of being depicted as hares. This image, modelled after a painting from the wooden synagogue in Chodorow, Ukraine depicts the double-headed Eagle from the Russian coat of arms, grasping a hare in its talons. While paired with a seemingly complimentary verse from Deuteronomy, about an eagle carrying its young “aloft,” the image not so secretly implies a predatory dynamic between Jews and the Empire. Image by Mark Podwal

Podwal notes how rabbinic writings “equate the ingestion of pork with the submission to foreign domination” and how Rome, whose legion based in Jerusalem had a boar as their standard, became a derisive symbol for the occupying Empire among Jews. That’s a lot of baggage for one animal. The pig’s image is further complicated, and weaponized, by Judensau, medieval statues placed outside of European churches, in which kippah-wearing Jews were depicted suckling at the teat of a sow.

Podwal resolves this complicated context in a single image: a statue of Romulus and Remus nursing from the she wolf, casting the shadow of a pig.

Podwal's image of the swine echoes the Jewish association with pigs and Rome while reframing the antisemitic imagery of _Judensau_ sculptures as a statement against Jewish oppression.

Podwal’s image of the swine echoes the Jewish association with pigs and Rome while reframing the antisemitic imagery of Judensau sculptures as a statement against Jewish oppression. Image by Mark Podwal

That one entry for one of the book’s most familiar animals has perhaps the least Jewish iconography. But in repurposing symbols of non- and anti-Jewish dominance, the page asserts a Jewish read of history and the animal kingdom — exactly what a Jewish bestiary should do.

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse..

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.