Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Make a Passover gift and support Jewish journalism. DONATE NOW
Fast Forward

Rachel Bloom Had To Buy Her Emmys Dress Because Designers Don’t Lend To Stars Bigger Than Size Two

High fashion is weird. Instead of subscribing to the belief that every body is beautiful and using celebrities of all sizes as walking billboards for their questionable art, high fashion designers adhere to the school of thought that says only two types of bodies are worthy of their clothes: size zero bodies and size two bodies.

Enter Rachel Bloom, star of “Crazy Ex-Girlfriend,” former Emmy winner, and proud size NOT two. Bloom said of her chic Gucci number on the Emmy red carpet Sunday evening that she “bought this dress because Gucci is not lending me a dress.”

Why not? According to Bloom, because she’s not a size zero or two.

“I said in an interview before it is hard to get places to lend to me because I am not a size zero,” said Bloom to E! Live. “But also I can afford it, so it’s okay.”

Bloom later clarified her statement on Twitter:

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that, despite Bloom’s success and fame, fashion houses aren’t jumping at the opportunity to have her dazzle in their clothes. She’s just another woman in a long line of female celebrities whose bodies deviate from Hollywood’s ideal — Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones have also gotten attention for speaking out publicly about the trials of dressing for an awards ceremony.

Hopefully, stars like Bloom will continue to speak out about the injustices of high fashion. After all, it may be too late to conquer climate change but we’ve got a real shot at convincing Gucci to one day deign to lend a high fashion pantsuit or two to the woman responsible for this music video.

Becky Scott is the editor of The Schmooze. Follow her on Twitter, @arr_scott

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.