Elena Kagan smiles after she is sworn in as a Supreme Court Justice. Image by Getty Images

By Aiden Pink October 5, 2017

Supreme Court justices often delve into the weeds of an oral argument, and many are not afraid to be blunt. But a question by Justice Elena Kagan during a case about a house party gone wrong gave new meaning to the term “high court.”

The case centered around a party at a house in Washington, D.C., which was organized by a woman named “Peaches.” The party featured loud music, alcohol, and impromptu lap dances. After neighbors complained to police about the noise, Peaches admitted to the police that she did not own the property, so the police arrested the partygoers and charged them with trespassing.

The people who were arrested sued the DCPD, alleging that the police did not have probable cause to arrest them.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

When discussing the intricacies of the case, Kagan referred to her own past experiences, drawing laughter from attendees.

“There are these parties that, once long ago, I used to be invited to where you didn’t know the host, but you know Joe is having a party,” she said. “And I can say that long, long ago, marijuana was maybe present at those parties?”

She added that “It just is not obvious that the reasonable partygoer is supposed to walk into this apartment and say: Got to get out of here [because they may unknowingly be trespassing]. And — and it seems a little bit hard that they’re subject to arrest.”

The case is District of Columbia v. Wesby.

Contact Aiden Pink at [email protected] or on Twitter, @aidenpink

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

2X match on all Passover gifts!

$90 → $180 $180 → $360

$360 → $720

Other amount