Richard Spencer and Ta-Nehisi Coates Image by Getty/Forward Montage

By Ari Feldman December 19, 2017

Ta-Nehisi Coates deleted his Twitter account Monday evening, and it may have been prompted by white nationalists.

Even Richard Spencer — the face of American white nationalism — eventually piled on the debate over an essay criticizing Coates’ new book.

Coates, a renowned public intellectual and a national correspondent for The Atlantic, was caught in a Twitter storm over the weekend after The Guardian published an essay criticizing his politics and relationship with Barack Obama. The essay by Cornel West, a socialist public intellectual and prominent critic of the Democratic Party, was widely shared across social media.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

The essay, called “Ta-Nehisi Coates is the neoliberal face of the black freedom struggle,” accused Coates of ignoring the Obama administration’s use of drone warfare and suggested that Coates has a “preoccupation with white acceptance.” The essay was prompted by Coates’ new book, “We Were Eight Years In Power,” about the Obama administration.

The essay ignited the Twittersphere, with writers, academics and activists weighing in.

This @CornelWest attack on @tanehisicoates is personal vendetta masked as intellectual debate, and once again exposes his Obama obsession. If West’s true interest was “fightback,” which isn’t a word, then a broadside like this seems like a waste of time. https://t.co/D2z9N0XKnS

— Jamil Smith (@JamilSmith) December 17, 2017

Perhaps Ta-Nehisi Coates’ greatest failing as a public intellectual was choosing to disconnect the white supremacy he so brilliantly examines from the specific policies advanced by the Obama Administration. The omission spoke volumes, and compromised his analysis.

— Khaled Beydoun (@KhaledBeydoun) December 17, 2017

One of the strongest responses came from New Yorker writer Jelani Cobb, who criticized West harshly for praising Malcolm X in the Guardian essay, despite West’s ties with the Nation of Islam and its leader, Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan said in 2000 that he “created the atmosphere that ultimately led to Malcolm X’s assassination.”

Honestly, I feel like it’s best to keep Malcolm’s name out your mouth if you running around with the dudes who killed him. Just talk about Paul Robeson instead or something.

— jelani cobb (@jelani9) December 18, 2017

As the debate wore on, Coates tweeted his articles to point to places where he had addressed things like drone warfare.

But West’s article soon began to take hold in white supremacist and white nationalist communities on Twitter. Coates responded with disbelief.

Image by twitter

He soon deleted his account.

Image by twitter

That evening, Richard Spencer retweeted West’s essay.

He’s not wrong. https://t.co/iQEaUhZNMd

— Richard ? Spencer (@RichardBSpencer) December 19, 2017

This was not the first time that Coates had suspended his Twitter account. He has questioned the usefulness of the social media platform for young journalists. But this appears to be the first time Coates has left Twitter after such a prominent intellectual spat.

After Coates’ account went inactive, several Twitter users responded with frustration — and pushed for further debate.

Glad the left is finally taking down one of its most important enemies: the guy who mainstreamed the idea of a mass transfer of wealth to African-Americans.

— Osita Nwanevu (@OsitaNwanevu) December 19, 2017

When Richard Spencer and Cornel West are in agreement, the analysis is amiss. One man can not be all things to all people. Instead of excoriating Ta-Nehisi, folks need to interrogate the system that propped him up as a lone, singular Black voice. https://t.co/kITnMdSmT8

— Evette Dionne ? (@freeblackgirl) December 19, 2017

Contact Ari Feldman at [email protected] or on Twitter @aefeldman

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism you rely on. Make a gift today!

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

$90 $180

$360

Other amount