Life

Donald Trump Tweets Without Consequences. His Critics Like Julia Ioffe Cannot.

By Phoebe Maltz Bovy December 15, 2016

It had long struck me that the one innocuous aspect of Trump’s anti-‘PC’ appeal — yes, in a sea of more sinister ones —is that he represents the ability to succeed without having gaffes or gauche slip-ups held against him. That thing where politicians had to be impeccable, to have never literally or proverbially inhaled, has carried over, in the social media age, to all. As Jon Ronson has reported one can get fired from a job doing pretty much whatever for a tweet about oh, just about anything.

We’ve had all these ambient cultural messages about how, if you screw up at all, if there’s a photo of you naked, or having a beer at age 20, or otherwise being scandalous, it will go on your permanent record, and then it’s straight to the gutter, which, perhaps, in a society without much of a safety net. Point being, while I don’t buy the argument that campus hypersensitivity and trigger warnings and so forth somehow (how?) led to Trump’s election, I do think a part of Trump’s appeal — not all, but a part — was that represented an alternative.

Donald and Ivanka Trump. Image by Getty Images

Which brings us to Politico’s startling firing of reporter Julia Ioffe, for… a tweet. She was fired for a tweet. One she has now deleted and apologized for. Fired after having quit (she was already heading to work at the Atlantic), but fired all the same. The tweet insinuated that there might be an incestuous relationship between the president-elect and his daughter, something that would be pretty outrageous under normal circumstances, which these are not.

It would seem, then, that we’re not in a post-gaffe era, but rather in one of double standards:

Just now seeing the @juliaioffe news. Are you telling me after the last 18 mos we’re gonna get the vapors because of a single tweet !?!

— Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes) December 15, 2016

The irony of this has not been lost on Ioffe herself, either:

We have a president-elect who popularized “saying what everyone is thinking,” but I guess my phrasing should’ve been more delicate.

— Julia Ioffe (@juliaioffe) December 14, 2016

Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. Her book, The Perils of “Privilege”, will be published by St. Martin’s Press in March 2017.

Phoebe Maltz Bovy is a former editor of the Sisterhood blog at the Forward. Her writing has appeared in several publications, including The New Republic and The Atlantic. Her book, “The Perils of ‘Privilege,’” was published by St. Martin’s Press in March 2017. She has a PhD in French and French Studies from New York University, and has read a lot of 19th century French Jewish newspapers for a 21st century American.

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO