Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Forward 50 2018

Natalie Portman

Divisive Conversation Starter

When Natalie Portman, 37, belatedly declined to come to Israel for the Genesis Prize ceremony, she set off a furor. Citing the “mistreatment of those suffering from today’s atrocities,” she said she could not travel to accept the prize. She set herself up as an embodiment of principles that were at odds with the government of Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, as she stated that “Because I care about Israel, I must stand up against violence, corruption, inequality, and abuse of power.”

Generally speaking there were three responses to her action.

Israeli minister Yuval Steinitz said, “Natalie Portman has played into the hands of the worst of our haters and of the worst of the anti-Semites in the Middle East.” In this, he was a vehement spokesman for a group of Israelis and Americans who thought her actions were a grave error and a betrayal of her Israeli roots.

Michael Koplow argued that Portman was totally right to do what she did and that she represented a significant majority of young American Jews in her action. He agreed with her that the current government of Israel is morally suspect and her stance was the only principled position to take.

And Forward editor-in-chief Jane Eisner argued that even if Portman did believe she was taking a stance, her actions were not even close to being the most effective way of furthering her position. Instead she should have followed the example of Elie Wiesel and “spoken truth to power.”

Whichever of the positions you agree with, there were few April discussions of Israel in America that did not start from an engagement with her stance. For better or worse, Portman monopolized the American Jewish conversation for a month.

— Dan Friedman

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.