Skip To Content
Get Our Newsletter

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe

Hiking Little Hitler

A little crag near Stockholm is causing a minor uproar in the Jewish world, thanks to the inconveniently named Cordelia Hess, a historian who, on a recent hike, took issue with several Nazi-inspired trail names. “I thought it rather unpleasant to climb through the ‘Crematorium’ or say that ‘now I am going to do Kristallnacht,’” she told Dagens Nyheter, a Swedish newspaper. “The use of such names on the climbing routes trivializes the Holocaust.”

Dagens Nyheter’s report gave examples of other Holocaust-themed trail names — including “Himmler,” “Third Reich,” “Zyklon B” and “Swastika” — and explained that long-standing climbing customs give naming rights to the first person to ascend a trail. The names, apparently, are inside jokes among hikers. A spokesman for the Swedish Climbing Federation, which manages the hiking area in question, told Dagens Nyheter that the names were “childish and disrespectful” but ultimately out of their control.

One climber, Mikael Widerberg, recalled naming one especially “horrible” trail “Little Hitler” in 2001. “It could be perceived as unpleasant, but it is a good thing if people are reminded of the story,” he told Dagens Nyheter. (According to David Falt, a European climber and blogger, the trail is described succinctly as “Short and evil.”) Widerberg added that there are trails called “worse things,” and said he would find a name inappropriate only if it “explicitly provoked a group.”

But climber Erik Djerf told The Local, another Swedish newspaper, that provocation was exactly the point. “The names are… often chosen to be deliberately provocative,” he said.

The day after Hess’s complaints appeared in the August 12 edition of Dagens Nyheter, the Swedish Climbing Federation posted a letter to its OWN Facebook page that restated its support for the tradition of climbers naming the routes they conquer, but the federation strongly urged its members to choose inoffensive names.

“Appalachian,” for example, has a nice, neutral ring to it.




Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit Foward and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, copy the HTML, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline, and credit to Foward. Have questions? Please email us at

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.