Watch Out, Waiters, David Brooks Is Coming For You

David Brooks Image by Getty/Chip Somodevilla/Staff
When you have a soapbox like The New York Times opinion page, you can be forgiven for thinking the world may want to hear your every thought. When it’s David Brooks, though, we’re all ears! Watch out, folks, this take is hot!
Waiters are 87% friendlier as they hand me the bill and I’m about to decide the tip amount than they are at any other point in the meal.
— David Brooks (@nytdavidbrooks) July 26, 2019
You read that right! In a stunning display of clear-minded and fearless acuity, the longtime Times columnist eviscerated that pampered class of restaurant workers. He really showed them.
This scorching insight, which filets servers’ desire to earn a living wage when their employees refuse to provide one, is even more complex than it first appears.
Let’s unpack: In addition to raking this privileged vocation over the coals for wanting to leave with a good impression before Brooks does his signature number-crunching on the bill – note that he provides his exact-science friendliness percentage to Twitter followers– he indicates that waiters may not always be falling over themselves to seem companionable.
There’s another layer here, too. Brooks, ever one to root his incisive social critique in his own experience, makes no mistake in applying this as a rule beyond himself. But who would not be friendly to David Brooks – the man who so keenly observed that his friend with “only a high school degree” was intimidated by Italian words at a sandwich shop – while he is dining?
Sadly, it turns out not everyone appreciates Brooks’s comment.
Oh, David. Every dining experience is a series of interactions. Rather than publicly mocking people who work hard for a living wage, might our energy be better spent scrutinizing our own behavior?
— Connie Schultz (@ConnieSchultz) July 26, 2019
this is a sad-ass statement from a man who a) talks about morals and ethics like the thinks he knows something, b) who makes god knows how much money, and c) rails against “elites.” But do go on.
— Jodi Jacobson (@jljacobson) July 26, 2019
thank you for your bravery in taking on this important issue, sir. the waiters of the world have had it too good for too long
— Mike Drucker (@MikeDrucker) July 26, 2019
And at what point of the meal did you start treating your waiter like a human being
— Julia Salazar (@JuliaCarmel__) July 26, 2019
Servers, take note: If you see Mr. Brooks at your table, please be kind. He’ll notice if you’re not.
PJ Grisar is the Forward’s culture fellow. He can be reached at [email protected].
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news. All donations are still being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000 until April 24.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

