British Court Says Government Anti-BDS Push Went Too Far
Graphic by Angelie Zaslavsky
Britain’s High Court has ruled that the government acted unlawfully in barring local municipal pension funds from engaging in “ethical divestment” from companies that do business in Israel.
BDS activists are hailing the ruling as a victory for their cause, even though a judge said politics had nothing to do with the ruling.
Hugh Lanning, chair of the Palestine Solidarity Committee, said: “Today is a victory for Palestine, for local democracy, and for the rule of law.”
The judge, Sir Ross Cranston, ruled the government had no right to micromanage how local pension schemes choose to invest. He emphasized that the ruling had nothing to do with the merits of the BDS cause.
“The political merits of the respective arguments have no relevance,” he said.
David Berens, a London-based lawyer who represents the Jewish National Fund on the Board of Deputies of British Jews, told the Algemeiner that the ruling was “disappointing.”
“BDS is clearly antisemitic within the meaning of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of antisemitism which the Government has adopted,” he said.
Contact Jesse Bernstein at [email protected] or on Twitter @__jbernstein
Why I became the Forward’s editor-in-chief
You are surely a friend of the Forward if you’re reading this. And so it’s with excitement and awe — of all that the Forward is, was, and will be — that I introduce myself to you as the Forward’s newest editor-in-chief.
And what a time to step into the leadership of this storied Jewish institution! For 129 years, the Forward has shaped and told the American Jewish story. I’m stepping in at an intense time for Jews the world over. We urgently need the Forward’s courageous, unflinching journalism — not only as a source of reliable information, but to provide inspiration, healing and hope.
— Alyssa Katz, editor-in-chief
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
