How Trump’s Nordstrom Tweet Took the Aspiration Out of Ivanka’s Brand
Ivanka Trump means business. Image by Getty Images
Imagine the following: You have an important business client, but they’re wavering. There’s a setback in your arrangement. You’re dealing with it. You’re on top of things. And then suddenly, boom, there’s your father — you are, for the purposes of argument, an adult woman, married with several kids — decides to tweet his disappointment at, as in @, the company.
There’s a lot to decode in Donald Trump’s anti-Nordstrom tweet, an event that appears to have further damaged Ivanka’s brand, and that would indeed pose various presidential-ethics questions, if we were not already awash in such a sea of those that it’s hard for a new one to even register. Anyway, a reminder of the tweet’s contents:
“My daughter Ivanka has been treated so unfairly by @Nordstrom. She is a great person — always pushing me to do the right thing! Terrible!”
What comes through most immediately is that the myth of Ivanka, Businesswoman In Her Own Right, is shattered. “My daughter,” as though Ivanka were one of those 15-year-old heiresses with a ‘handbag line’, as versus… a somewhat older heiress with various business endeavors well past the ‘trunk show at family friend’s Hamptons’ house, as a favor’ stage. It’s clear that Trump gets — that everyone gets — that this is about him, his presidency, his brand, and that Ivanka-stamped merch is of interest only by association.
Then we have the “great person” interlude. The second sentence starts off as a generic statement of family loyalty, but then veers of into a subtweet of another Ivanka myth, namely that she’s her father’s conscience. Setting aside the odd placement of “terrible,” what’s Donald getting at?
The message is clear: Ivanka is to be cast as a nice liberal when it’s convenient. Donald engages in a bit of — yes, wild, I know — modesty here, very uncharacteristic, yes, but there’s a point to it. By acknowledging the obvious — that he’s in constant desperate need of a nudge “to do the right thing” — he sets up Ivanka as somehow untarnished by his awfulness, even while she, you know, profits from his role. And even as he involves himself in business dealings that ostensibly have zilch to do with him and that reallllly shouldn’t have a thing to do with his presidency.
But it’s the infantilizing angle that I can’t get past. I think I might, for once, feel sorry for Ivanka. Not for having her line dropped by Nordstrom — oh, she had that coming — but for being a grown-up woman whose boundary-lacking father couldn’t leave well enough alone.
Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. Her book, The Perils of “Privilege”, will be published by St. Martin’s Press in March 2017.
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
