What Aaron Sorkin’s Gaffe Has In Common With White House Photo-Ops
Diversity in action in the Oval Office. Image by Getty Images
Screenwriter Aaron Sorkin had an epiphany of sorts over the weekend. He announced at an industry event that he could not believe people who aren’t white men face obstacles in Hollywood. Did he really only just notice this, one wonders? Without entering his mind — a superpower that eludes this Sisterhood Editor — it’s impossible to say.
To me, the message from this outrage-bait kerfuffle wasn’t that the time has come for someone to painstakingly sit Aaron Sorkin down and explain the concepts of white privilege, male privilege, and so forth. Rather, the takeaway here is that the education or gaffe paradigm is lacking. The problem isn’t Aaron Sorkin failing to understand diversity and putting his foot in his mouth. It’s a system that favors creators of some demographics over others, thereby stifling not just opportunities for member of marginalized groups, but also representations of the full scope of human experience.
Along similar paradigm-shifting lines: I highly recommend Jill Filipovic’s latest New York Times op-ed, “The All-Male Photo Op Isn’t a Gaffe. It’s a Strategy.” In it, Filipovic questions conventional wisdom about those all-male photo ops that keep coming out of the White House: “Is this really a pattern of errors? Maybe these aren’t tone-deaf mistakes at all, but intentional messages to right-wing supporters.” She contends — and I suspect she’s right — that “[t]he great America [the Trump administration] promised has white men at the top, and that’s the image they’re projecting, figuratively and literally. It’s not an error, it’s the game plan.”
It’s ultimately unknowable whether individual instances of cluelessness are actually intentional bigotry in action. What is possible, however, is to shift feminist focus from addressing cluelessness to bringing about justice.
Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. She is the author of “The Perils Of ‘Privilege’”, from St. Martin’s Press. Follow her on Twitter, @tweetertation
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
