Skip To Content
Back to Opinion

Trump’s Angry Pittsburgh Response Killed GOP Chance Of Midterms Victory

In the aftermath of the terrible synagogue massacre in Pittsburgh, President Trump has been forced to figure out how to respond sensitively while also campaigning for the looming midterm elections. In a world in which 71% of Jews vote for Democrats, many of whom have decided to leverage this tragedy into a political call to arms, this is no easy task.

But it’s a political reality that the President, especially this close to the midterms, is forced to reckon with.

His efforts haven’t been off to a great start. Instead of acting as a comforting presence after the shooting, the President blamed the death toll on the congregants and leadership of the Tree of Life synagogue.

“If they had protection inside, the results would have been far better,” he said. “If they had some kind of a protection inside the temple, maybe it could have been a very much [sic] different situation.”

President Trump had an opportunity to show the country that he is willing and able to be a leader, but he failed.

In countless swing districts across the country, Republicans are facing tough races, and Trump isn’t making their jobs any easier.

In the days that followed, the President traveled to Pittsburgh and met with the rabbi of the Tree of Life congregation, hospital staff and victims.

His daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner accompanied him, and their presence served as a reminder that the President has a Jewish daughter and Jewish grandchildren.

Unfortunately, many liberals only used this fact to decry the President’s supposed anti-Semitism, arguing that he brought his Jewish family members to shield himself from attacks, or worse, claimed that he was trying to whitewash anti-Semitism.

We’re a country that not only suffers from mass shootings, but from the politicization of these shootings after the fact.

There are ways for politicians to act with sensitivity in the aftermath of a tragedy. Perhaps one of the best modern examples is the unexpected solidarity between New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and President Barack Obama after Hurricane Sandy.

Christie and President Obama literally embraced after the massive storm in 2012.

Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign suffered; criticism of the President became a minefield that Romney was never able to adequately navigate.

The solidarity between President Obama and Christie crippled Romney’s campaign in the weeks it needed to be at its most ferocious. As one commentator put it, “Rather than engage in divisive, partisan behavior, Obama rose above the fray, donned the First Windbreaker, and did his job.”

President Trump had a chance to pull off the same kind of solidarity with the Jewish community and has spectacularly failed.

His most memorable statement was nothing short of victim-blaming. Those praying at Shabbat morning services and celebrating the birth of a baby didn’t enable their killer.

Placing the blame on anyone except the perpetrator is precisely the kind of divisive statement we’ve come to expect from the President in moments we need his leadership more than ever.

There’s no way of knowing what might have been different had armed security been present, though multiple armed members of the police were among the victims of the attack. Their weapons and training didn’t save their lives — or the lives of those around them.

But even if the presence of armed security might have improved the outcome, a unifying and presidential statement would have simply expressed sympathy for the loss of life. Perhaps after, he could have mentioned his support for removing the bureaucratic red tape separating synagogue security volunteers from conceal carry permits.

He could have tried to work with local law enforcement to ensure synagogues received training and protection from local law enforcement agencies. Instead, he placed the blame for the greatest massacre of Jews in American history on the shoulders of those inside the synagogue.

Of course, it wasn’t just the President who blamed the victims. The Associated Press tweeted that the killer had “exploited doors that were unlocked for worship,” and journalist Julia Ioffe bizarrely blamed pro-Trump, pro-Israel Jews.

Just as the congregants weren’t responsible for their own deaths because of a lack of guns in the building, pro-Israel Trump supporters aren’t responsible either.

It’s especially infuriating to blame Jewish support for the President considering the fact that the shooter was angry at Trump for being surrounded by too many Jewish people.

There is only one man responsible for this terrible tragedy, and only one ideology responsible: anti-Semitism.

Just like the president, the left has wasted an opportunity to promote unity by nakedly exploiting dead Jews for a few House seats. A member of the communications team for the Human Rights Campaign tweeted a common sentiment:

Shannon Watts, the founder of Moms Demand, a gun control organization, tweeted that attendees at a vigil chanted one word: vote. Even a vigil isn’t off-limits for some.

Celebrities joined in, with Fran Drescher tweeting,

Future Congresswoman Alexandra Oscio-Cortez even sent a fundraising email trying to cash in on dead Jews.

President Trump has been made into the boogyman of the massacre by many on the Left. It’s craven, and voters see the effort for what it is, just as they can see the harm in the President’s decision to make a massacre of Jews about having more guns in public spaces.

This is apparently what we do in America in the wake of a mass casualty event. Not only do the President and his prominent opponents politicize the events, but they do so by placing blame on the victims themselves.

It’s a tiresome tradition we’ve adopted; trying to bend and twist tragic events to fit a preferred political narrative in order to win elections.

Instead of coming together against anti-Semitism, a growing scourge around the world, we’re spending yet another day arguing about President Trump.

Bethany Mandel is a columnist for the Forward.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.