In his March 16 op-ed, “The Paradox of Religious Liberty,” Jonathan Sarna criticizes the congressional testimony of Rabbi Meir Soloveichik in the latter’s attack upon the requirement that health insurance plans include the cost of contraception as threatening the “liberties of conscience” inscribed in the Constitution. Sarna contends that Soloveichik overlooked the countervailing First Amendment right of employees not to be “religiously coerced” and that refusing to mandate employers to pay for contraception by employees is just the type of conduct prohibited by the First Amendment.

Even if one puts aside the issue of whether a religious organization employer’s refusal to share any of its employees’ costs for contraception can somehow be viewed as religious coercion, Sarna overlooked a simple fact, dispositive of his stated First Amendment right in support of requiring health insurance plans to cover contraception. The First Amendment only prohibits “Congress” (and, by reason of the 14th Amendment, the States) from enacting a law that either establishes or impinges on the free exercise of, religion. It has absolutely nothing to do with private employers and employees.

Thus while Soloveichik can legitimately argue that a federal law that mandates a Catholic institution employer to pay for insurance plans of its employees that include contraception is a violation of the First Amendment, Sarna cannot rely upon the First Amendment to support the position that a law that exempts religious institutions from such mandate — and thus preserves the religious institution employer’s autonomy in this area — is unconstitutional.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

To be sure, one can put forward good-faith arguments for the requirement that health insurance plans of all employers cover the cost of contraception. The First Amendment, however, cannot be counted among them.

Julius Berman
New York, N.Y.

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism you rely on. Make a gift today!

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

$90 $180

$360

Other amount