In a confession that will resonate with all people who have ever failed to get a job they wanted, actress and model Emily Ratajkowski announced that people do not want to work with her because she is “too sexy.”

The 26-year-old, who is best known for dancing in the music video for Robin Thicke’s politically unfortunate “Blurred Lines” and for her role in “Gone Girl”, told Harper’s Bazaar Australia:

It’s like an anti-woman thing, that people don’t want to work with me because my boobs are too big. What’s wrong with boobs? They’re a beautiful feminine thing that needs to be celebrated. Like, who cares? They are great big, they are great small. Why should that be an issue?

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

Here, Ratajkowski makes several great points. Boobs are indeed “a beautiful, feminine thing that needs to be celebrated.” Our culture’s ongoing confusion over the quandary that is boobs (how can they be sources of sexual pleasure and infant nutrition? how is a raven like a writing desk?) has put a damper on almost every boob-related fête I have attended. Boobs ARE great at all sizes. Boobs should NOT be an issue. Every writer who has ever been rejected because a publication found her talent too intimidating, every doctor who has ever been passed over professionally because she is too good at curing people, will sympathize with Ratajkowski’s plight.

In all seriousness—that women everywhere are subject to punishing and demanding beauty standards developed by and for men is not up for debate. That these standards have a riddle-like complexity (she must be excessively beautiful in a subtle way—wildly sexy yet modest—sensual and maternal!) is obvious. And that there are real cases where women have lost out on jobs because some male interviewers are so mentally underdeveloped that they cannot stop sexualizing beautiful or large breasted women is just true.

But since Emily Ratajkowski is an actress and model, perhaps the two fields that place the highest premium on women’s looks, it is hard to imagine that she is a victim of absurd beauty standards, rather than a victor.

Much like losing out professionally for being considered “too sexy”, Ratajkowski’s claim that her views are “feminist” cuts both ways—on one hand, powerful Jewish celebrities claiming feminism is exciting. On the other hand, Ratajkowski has once again invited us to enter into blurred lines.

Regardless of whether or not Ratajkowski’s claim is true, I pray that someday her boobs bring her nothing but joy, hope, and above all, work.

Jenny Singer is a writer for the Forward. You can reach her at [email protected] or on Twitter @jeanvaljenny.

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

2X match on all Passover gifts!

$90 → $180 $180 → $360

$360 → $720

Other amount