Mr. Spielberg, and his very nice scarf Image by Getty Images

I don’t want to be your token crazed liberal arts millennial, but the fact is that if Steven Spielberg had criticized Natalie Portman’s Golden Globes comment about the “all-male nominees” for best director, I would have have built a model of E.T. and burned it in effigy, and I would have demanded that you do the same.

Luckily, that doesn’t have to happen.

Actress/genius Natalie Portman stole a sliver of Golden Globe glory in understated style on Sunday night. Introducing the “Best Director of a Motion Picture” category, she ad-libbed the qualifying phrase “and here are the all-male nominees.” The camera instantly panned to the dumbfounded and ashamed faces of Hollywood’s most powerful directors. Even winning director Guillermo del Toro’s acceptance speech was overshadowed by the aftershocks of Portman’s comment. But what did Hollywood’s creative power brokers make of all this?

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

“There’s also a watershed happening right now, slowly, maybe not fast enough, for women directors,” Spielberg wisely responded when asked to comment on Portman’s jab on Tuesday. He noted the success of “Wonder Woman” powerhouse director Patty Jenkins and added, “We have some amazing women that have come forward, you know ‘Mudbound’ and ‘Lady Bird’. This is a pretty incredible year, and I think you’ll be seeing some nominations [sic] I’m predicting at the Oscars this year for a woman director, if not several.”

Del Toro also responded positively to Portman’s jibe, gamely (and probably fearfully) commenting, “I think it was great! She should say exactly what she feels. There is phenomenal work being done by female directors.” He, too, invoked the female-helmed films “Mudbound,” “Lady Bird,” and “Wonder Woman,” calling them “terrific.” And Jenkins herself told Entertainment Tonight of Portman’s comment, “What could you say? It made me laugh, and it made me smile.” She added, “Look, it’s been a little glaring that women directors don’t get nominated so often and it is odd. Particularly when their films are being celebrated in every other way, so I thought it was interesting to highlight it.” Jenkins noted that the exclusively male category demanded a comment, and said of Portman’s “she did it so perfectly.”

So Spielberg continues to go down in history as one of the good guys. But let’s not forget actress-director Elizabeth Banks’ potent criticism claiming a total absence of female-fronted movies in Spielberg’s cannon. Banks apologized profusely after learning that three out of Spielberg’s thirty-one movies feature women in the lead role (women are bad at math, I guess!) but it’s hard to believe that public criticism like that didn’t influence Spielberg’s choice to give Meryl Streep first billing in his most recent film “The Post.” which

Listen, Mr. Spielberg, Steven, why don’t you just mount a “Indiana Jones” reboot starring Gal Gadot in the lead role, and we’ll call us even.

Jenny Singer is a writer for the Forward. You can reach her at [email protected] or on Twitter @jeanvaljenny

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

2X match on all Passover gifts!

$90 → $180 $180 → $360

$360 → $720

Other amount