Cynthia Nixon (left) and Lena Dunham Image by GETTY IMAGES/FORWARD MONTAGE

“Fox News Blurs the Facts of a Story to Make an Obscure Point Denigrating Women” is hardly breaking news at this point, any more than “Airplanes Go Up In the Air” is breaking news.

But we feel honor bound, and also bound by the cumulative one million hours we’ve spent watching HBO content, to report that both Fox News and The Daily Mail published headlines about “Girls” star Lena Dunham’s support for New York gubernatorial candidate and former “Sex and the City Star” Cynthia Nixon that are so misleading as to appear intentionally dishonest.

The always polarizing Dunham posted on Instagram on Monday night that she threw a fundraiser for the actress-turned-politician. Dunham, who has always thrown herself into liberal politics to varying degrees of success, has also reportedly given $10,000 to Nixon’s campaign. In one image included in the post, Dunham and Nixon are standing with their arms around each other in a group of supporters, and in a short clip they are waving “Sex and the City”-inspired Nixon campaign merchandise. Shortly after, Dunham made a separate post featuring herself in underwear and a t-shirt representing The Wing, a women’s social club founded by Dunham’s friend Audrey Gelman. The caption on the second post references The Wing, and nothing in the image or wording of the caption invokes Cynthia Nixon.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

Image by Screenshot

Friends, let us be plain: It would be okay, and probably mildly amusing, if Lena Dunham campaigned for Cynthia Nixon in her underwear. But she didn’t. Women including Dunham who, like it or not, is a champion of body acceptance, are allowed to operate in different modes at different times. Once they take their pants off, they do not lose credibility. Once they proclaim themselves as sexual or artistic beings, they do not abdicate their rights to be political advocates or business people. Once they say something serious, they are allowed to later also say something not serious.

And, interestingly, if you are a person who wrote Lena Dunham off long ago because of her fascination with nudity, you are Fox News’ target audience. That article, and the Mail’s, were written with your Dunham-hating, body-repulsed clicks in mind.

So how do you like them apples?

via GIPHY

Jenny Singer is the deputy lifestyle editor for the Forward. You can reach her at [email protected] or on Twitter @jeanvaljenny

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism you rely on. Make a gift today!

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

$90 $180

$360

Other amount