Against
Uzi Arad
Former head of National Security Council, former director of research for the Mossad
What he said and where
Told Forward columnist J.J. Goldberg that Israel must work with Washington, not unilaterally, against Iranian nuclear threat in July 22 interview.
What it means
Believes Israel alone cannot stop Iran from achieving nuclear weapons capability over the long run.
“One needs American leadership, one needs American resources. One needs American abilities, either diplomatic or military.”
Gabi Ashkenazi
Former Israel Defense Forces chief of staff
What he said and where
Voiced opposition to a unilateral strike at a Jerusalem Post conference in New York on April 29.
What it means
Views the problem as an international one; Israel must act as part of an international alliance; sanctions worked in 2003, when Iran froze nuclear research under international pressure.
“I think we still have time. It is not tomorrow morning.”
Ami Ayalon
Former head of Shin Bet
What he said and where
Told Forward columnist J.J. Goldberg on July 8 that an Israeli strike would only delay the Iranian nuclear program.
What it means
Sees U.S. and NATO participation as crucial for success of a strike.
“The perception should be that we did everything possible in the diplomatic track [so] it’s now legitimate to act.”
Meir Dagan
Former head of the Mossad
What he said and where
Opposed attack at Hebrew University conference on May 6, 2011, and in frequent interviews since.
What it means
Doubts pilots could reach enough of Iran’s well-scattered nuclear targets; attack will trigger a war with unpredictable consequences; takes President Obama at his word that the United States won’t allow Iran to become a nuclear state.
Called attack proposal “the stupidest thing I ever heard.”’
The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.