Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Image by Getty Images

In a new study, Tonja Jacobi and Dylan Schweers of Northwestern found that on the Supreme Court, “the male justices interrupt the female justices approximately three times as often as they interrupt each other during oral arguments.” In their Harvard Business Review piece about their findings, Jacobi, a law professor, and Schweers, a J.D. candidate suggest this pattern is not about to resolve itself:

We conducted an in-depth analysis of the 1990, 2002, and 2015 terms to see whether the same patterns held when there were fewer female justices on the court. We found a consistently gendered pattern: In 1990, with one woman on the bench (former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor), 35.7% of interruptions were directed at her; in 2002, 45.3% were directed at the two female justices (O’Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg); in 2015, 65.9% of all interruptions on the court were directed at the three female justices on the bench (Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan). With more women on the court, the situation only seems to be getting worse.

How disappointing that, as a Mashable headline put it, “Not even Ruth Bader Ginsburg is safe from manterruptions.” If the nation’s finest women judges get cut off in this way, what hope is there for a woman who was (say) too intimidated even to do high school debate? One can take comfort, I suppose, in the fact that the issue is being taken seriously and studied empirically. It can be reassuring to learn that a phenomenon many women have experienced is not in our imagination. That may not make it any less frustrating.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

On that note — and with apologies for the chametz — I leave you with a highlight from “The Great British Baking Show,” where contestant Nancy refers to super-intimidating judge Paul Hollywood (who, along with British legend Mary Berry, was assessing the competition) simply, and maybe even a bit dismissively, as “the male judge.” Sometimes the smallest acts of subtly feminist defiance are, if nothing else, the most memorable.

I love this moment on the GBBO where Nancy starts referring to Paul strictly as “the male judge” lolz pic.twitter.com/rJOnIvJpf2

— Amk (@Amyisgrossx) February 7, 2016

Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. She is the author of “The Perils Of ‘Privilege’”, from St. Martin’s Press. Follow her on Twitter, @tweetertation

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism you rely on. Make a gift today!

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

$90 $180

$360

Other amount