White Bathing Suits, Red Hats and Other Tampon Ad Tropes
By Elissa Strauss February 23, 2010
The perils of tampon advertisements was the topic of conversation Monday evening, when DoubleX co-editor (and Bintel Brief guest columnist) Hanna Rosin, former “Colbert Report” executive producer Allison Silverman, Sarah Haskins of Current TV and Susan Kim, author of the new book “Flow: The Cultural History of Menstruation” (St. Martin’s Griffin, 2009) came together in New York for “That Not-So-Fresh Feeling: Marketing Embarrassing Products to Women.”
The panelists were incisive — and hilarious — in their dissection of fem-care product advertising; they pointed to tampon and maxi pad ad tropes, such as the beachy and nautical imagery, white dresses and bathing suits, and stylish urbanites in bold reds hats.
Their collective thesis seemed to be that these advertisements send the message to women that they should be ashamed of their bodily functions; after all, the ads never actually address menstruation head on, but instead focus on endorsing a carefree lifestyle — a not-so-logical supposed byproduct of using their goods. (The definition of carefree, as we learned in slide shows presented, changes from one decade to the next, from wealthy socialites and hard-bodied athletes of decades past to the cosmopolitan fashionistas of today.)
Yes, it’s true: Advertisements are silly and, overall, degrading. But what wasn’t discussed last night was how much effect these advertisements really have on women. I know that for me, when I got my first period, it was hardly marked by the shame and secrecy that the advertisements in the early ’90’s presented. In fact, I felt quite proud of the fact that I had begun menstruating. I was a woman! There was something very powerful and goddess-like about the whole rite of passage, and I sensed that at 13. In fact, as far as rite-of-passages go, menstruating far outshone the bat mitzvah I had at the same age.
From my vantage point, the same was true for most of my friends and middle school “frenemies”; getting your period was considered cool, and those late-bloomers were embarrassed not to be part of the club, so to speak.
While ads didn’t seem to affect me much, I remember being truly moved the first episode of “Blossom” (starring another Bintel Brief guest columnist Mayim Bialik), which replayed in my head during the panel discussion, though I had not seen it in nearly 20 years. Thanks to YouTube, I just re-watched the episode in which Blossom “blossoms,” and was shocked about how Blossom and her best friend, Six, manage to cover so many of the points made in Monday’s dialogue. The opening scene of the first “Blossom” episode, which aired in 1991, was dedicated to two teenage girls wisely discussing periods — remarkable! At the end of the episode the family puts on their Sunday best to go out for Chinese food to celebrate Blossom’s induction into womanhood.
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
