‘Merry Christmas’ Does Double Duty as Innocuous Greeting and Dog-Whistle
Donald Trump Image by Getty Images
It’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas. pic.twitter.com/iLjpDQmDvA
— Heritage Foundation (@Heritage) December 12, 2016
The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, tweeted its holiday well-wishes, and by “holiday well-wishes” I mean Christmastime message of exclusion. “We’re going to start saying ‘Merry Christmas again,’” the message reads, with a photo of a camouflage MAGA-hat-wearing Trumpster giving a thumbs up. This is indeed something Trump said at a recent rally in Michigan:
President-elect @realDonaldTrump: “We’re going to start saying ‘Merry Christmas’ again!” pic.twitter.com/kzpTKri4sp
— Fox News (@FoxNews) December 10, 2016
Watching this was, I thought, quite chilling. (Yes, we all know the refrain: Even by Trump standards.) Getting wished a Merry Christmas isn’t generally intended as a religious-minority-slighting microaggression, but is simply small talk in a majority-Christian country. You just return the greeting (or some variant of it) and move on with your day. Insistence on “Christmas,” however — that is, the politicized backlash against a War on Christmas that never was — isn’t an inadvertent insensitivity. It’s intentional, and it summons in me the twin desires to wish the recipient various happy non-Christian holidays and to say things to them that are, shall we say, more direct.
The only thing that makes me panic slightly less, oddly enough, is the context, namely Trump’s anti-PC victory tour. In an Iowa installment, the president-elect graciously reacted to being named Time magazine’s Person of the Year by whining about how it’s now “Person” as opposed to “Man of the Year.”
Why, you may ask, would I find the fact that Trump’s being casually sexist in addition to casually anti-religious-minority at his rallies these days (slightly, I mean very slightly) comforting? Because put together, they tell us that he’s still in Archie Bunker mode. This sort of anti-‘PC’ is familiar. It’s bigoted and unacceptable and all that, yes, but isn’t Phase One of a fascist project.
Please, then, let it be that. Let the regime set us back 30 years, if it must. Not 80.
Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. Her book, The Perils of “Privilege”, will be published by St. Martin’s Press in March 2017.
