Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion
Make a Passover gift and support Jewish journalism. DONATE NOW

Nelson’s Jeopardy

It’s going to be illuminating to see how the civil rights community reacts to one of the defenses Lemrick Nelson is likely to raise against charges that he violated the civil right of Yankel Rosenbaum in killing him during the Crown Heights riot. The lawyer who won acquittal of Mr. Nelson on the state charges, Arthur Lewis, is quoted by The New York Times this week as asserting that the civil rights charge is a “wrongful” prosecution. “It amounts to double jeopardy,” The Times quotes him as saying.

Generally the courts have spurned this defense under the civil rights law. The theory is that the civil rights charges are not brought by the same people — the people of New York brought the murder charge against Mr. Nelson, the people of America are bringing the civil rights case against him — and that even though the charges stem from the same act on the part of Mr. Nelson, they are not being lodged under the same law. Nor were many voices raised against the Bush administration’s decision to use civil rights law to prosecute the police officers who beat Rodney King after they’d been acquitted under California law.

In any event, prosecutors of Lemrick Nelson are going to have a harder time than the prosecutors of Stacey Koon and Laurence Powell, because the civil rights law holds law enforcement officers to a particularly high standard.

What can be said at the moment is that the federal prosecution is a vote of no-confidence in the jury that acquitted Mr. Nelson the first time and later feted Mr. Nelson at a dinner party. It is a sad day when a law crafted to bring justice to Southern counties in the grip of Jim Crow has to be used to try to wrest justice from the citizens of New York for the murder of a Jew by a mob of black youths.

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.