Take It From A Civil Liberties Professor – Trump And Hitler Have A Lot In Common
Donald Trump and Adolf Hitler, each giving a speech.
I hate to put Donald Trump and Adolf Hitler in the same sentence. It trivializes Hitler’s obscene crimes to compare them with Trump’s often pathetic foibles. And it understates our nation’s historic commitment to constitutional democracy to suggest a serious parallel between the twenty first century United States and 1930’s Weimar Germany.
But I can’t ignore the fact that Trump’s savagely divisive political rhetoric, both as a candidate and as our 45th President, closely tracks the tropes that Adolf Hitler used from 1932-36 to persuade a critical mass of the German people to trade their democratic birthright for a Nazi pottage of xenophobia, bigotry, and scapegoats.
Hitler did not take power by force. Germany dropped into his maw like a piece of overripe fruit spoiled by years of poisonous, corrosive rhetoric. The real risk to American democracy posed by Trump’s talent for invective and divisiveness is not a military putsch. It is the erosion of the bonds of mutual respect and common decency that hold constitutional democracies together.
One key to Hitler’s success in talking German democracy to death can be found in the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem, where two small green plastic cubes rest almost unnoticed on small display tables—surviving examples of the miniature radios distributed free of charge by the Nazi Party in the years following 1932. There was only one catch: the free radios received only a single frequency—the unremitting, unadulterated voice of Adolf Hitler spewing his witches’ brew of bigotry and hate directly into the heads of 35-40% of the German people.
Trump’s mastery of Twitter is the twenty-first century analogue of those green plastic radios, forging a direct line of unfiltered communication with 40 million Americans, enabling Trump to stoke mass fears and foment divisive anger on demand
And it should not come as a surprise that Donald Trump is so adept at mimicking Hitler’s rhetoric. Trump studied at the feet of the master. We know from Ivana Trump’s now-sealed testimony at Trump’s first divorce trial that the young Donald slept with a copy of Hitler’s speeches, published in English in 1941 as “My New Order,” on his bed-stand.
Give Trump credit. He did his homework well and became a master of divisive rhetoric capable of unravelling the social fabric of a tolerant democracy. A comparison of the speeches collected in Hitler’s “My New Order” and Trump’s political rhetoric yields chilling parallels. Here are just a few.
Hitler promised to return Germany to pre-WW I greatness, railing against a shadowy international order dedicated to keeping Germany in chains. Trump promises to make America great again, railing against a shadowy international order dedicated to fleecing America. Hitler pulled Germany from the League of Nations. Trump has already pulled the United States from multilateral treaties and threatens to pull us from NATO.
Both Trump and Hitler waged war on the idea of objective truth, relentlessly disseminating a pastiche of lies and half-truths designed to persuade a populist jury of the Leader’s distorted version of reality. Hitler coined the term “lugenpresse” (lying press) to castigate the mainstream newspapers bent on exposing his lies. Trump insists that he is the target of “fake news” invented by a lying mainstream press. Hitler derided scientific experts who disagreed with his crackpot racial and economic theories. Trump attacks climate scientists and economists who disagree with his policies.
Hitler demonized and belittled his political opponents, calling them scum, vermin and parasites. Trump rants about “the deep state,” “Mexican rapists,” immigrants from “shithole nations,” and leads his followers in chants about jailing his political opponents for treason.
Hitler celebrated Aryan white supremacy, warning of a coming cultural Armageddon when the forces of the (white) West would be confronted by inferior hordes from the (non-white) East. Trump also warns of a coming, racially-tinged cultural Armageddon, never missing an opportunity to inject racial divisiveness into American life, even infecting Hurricane relief for Puerto Rico with racial overtones.
Both Hitler and Trump excelled at scapegoating. Hitler’s poisonous rants blamed Jews, Roma, and the “elites” for Germany’s problems. Trump blames Muslims, undocumented immigrants from Central America, and “the elites” for America’s problems.
Hitler hardened Germany’s border, restricting travel to and from the country, and engaging in trade wars designed to benefit German industry. Trump bans Muslims, wants to build a wall on the Southern border, and has initiated trade wars with China, India, Europe, Canada, and Mexico.
Hitler used the pretext of the Reichstag fire in 1933 to declare a “national emergency” justifying the exercise of unilateral Executive power. Trump has used multiple declarations of non-existent national emergencies to ignore Congress.
Hitler viewed women solely as wives and mothers, resisting the entry of women into the workforce. Trump may be the most openly misogynist man to serve as President, treating women as little more than sex objects and waging war on their reproductive freedom.
There’s no easy antidote to Trumpist vitriol. But it helps to recognize that Trump is playing at being a Sorcerer’s Apprentice, casting ugly and divisive spells that he does not understand and cannot control. The fate of German democracy shows us where those spells can lead unless we defend constitutional democracy in the only forum that really matters—the voting booth.
Defending constitutional democracy in 2020 against Trumpist erosion won’t be easy. But two mid-20th century generations defended democracy in a hot war against Hitler and cold war against Stalin. All we are asked to do is to stand up for democracy at the voting booths. Make no mistake: it is the continued health of constitutional democracy itself that is on the ballot in 2020.
Burt Neuborne is the Norman Dorsen Professor of Civil Liberties and founding legal director of NYU School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice and has participated in more than two hundred cases in the U.S. Supreme Court. Neuborne is the author of Madison’s Music and the forthcoming book When at Times the Mob Is Swayed: A Citizen’s Guide to Defending Our Republic (both from The New Press) and lives in New York.
A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.
If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
