An official displays a map of the divided town of Hebron, in the Israeli occupied West Bank, on February 17, 2020. – Around the time US President Donald Trump took office, a group of Israeli families more than 10,000 kilometres (6,000 miles) away started a wildcat settlement near the Dead Sea in the Palestinians territories. In the three years since, it has become the outpost of Kedem Arava, home to 40 families. It is believed to be the first Israeli settlement of the Trump era, and one of dozens built under the decade-long rule of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Photo by Emmanuel DUNAND / AFP) (Photo by EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP via Getty Images) Image by Getty Images

Dear Editor,

Jodi Rudoren’s recent editorial raised an interesting point about when an attack should be classified as terrorism. However, this question barely scratches the surface of the complexities of the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

Consider, for instance, the question of asymmetry of the opposing sides. The editorial makes Israel, with its formidable armed forces, the Goliath, while painting the Palestinian people, said to have no option other than violence for opposing the occupation, as David. Yet, it is easy to argue that the roles should, in fact, be reversed. Tiny Israel has repeatedly triumphed when under attack by the armies of several nations (such as Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq).

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

And why should we accept the argument that there is an Occupation at all? All Palestinians in Gaza have been living under Hamas rule since 2006. 95% of the Palestinians in Judea and Samaria (called The West Bank by Jordanian occupiers between 1949 and 1967) have lived under the administration of the Palestinian Authority since 1993. True, the areas are not totally divorced from Israeli control, but they could have been, if the leaders had stopped the attacks and negotiated with Israel.

Unfortunately, for the Palestinian people, both Yasser Arafat (2000/2001) and Mahmoud Abbas (2008) flatly refused Israeli proposals for the establishment of the first-ever-to-exist Arab State of Palestine on essentially all of the disputed land, even with the possibility of shared governance in parts of Jerusalem.

Hamas used the 2005 withdrawal of all Jewish communities from Gaza to turn the area into a launching pad for attacks on Israeli population centers. Mahmoud Abbas announced his refusal to discuss the Trump administration’s peace plan years before its details were released.

Bottom line: Do people have the right to use force to achieve what they have refused to accept via diplomacy and negotiation? This editorial shed no light on that question.

Sincerely,

Toby Block

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism you rely on. Make a gift today!

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

$90 $180

$360

Other amount