Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Make a Passover gift and support Jewish journalism. DONATE NOW
The Schmooze

Natalie Portman Is Perfectly Qualified To Talk About ‘Racist’ Israeli Law

Film star Natalie Portman told the British Arabic newspaper Al Quds Al-Arabi that she thinks Israel’s nation-state law is “racist.”

“I do not agree with it,” Portman said, adding, “I only hope that we will be able to truly love our neighbors and that we can work together.”

Agree? Disagree? It’s all legitimate. But heed:

This is your regular reminder that the cost of having likable Jewish film stars is that some of them might be hyper-educated, well-read thinkers who are capable of dissecting national policy.

Natalie Portman is entitled to her opinions — and her right to speak up.

In the case of Portman, we have an Israeli-born Hebrew speaker who has cultivated a relationship with the country her entire life. She is a dual-citizen with Israel and the United States, and studied in a graduate program at Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

In [an interview she gave while promoting her upcoming movie “Vox Lux,” Portman called the law, passed by the Israeli parliament this summer, “a mistake.” The controversial law states that Israel is the homeland of the Jewish people, and that “the fulfillment of the right of self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people.” It calls the “unified city of Jerusalem” the capital of Israel, and says that Hebrew is the national language of the country (while Arabic has “special status,”) and reaffirms the right of return for Jewish people to Israel. It also notes that “The state views Jewish settlement as a national value and will labor to encourage and promote its establishment and development.”

Critics, like Portman, say that this law disenfranchises Israeli Arabs and Palestinians, and is anti-democratic. Supporters say that the law simply codifies what was already true and accepted concerning Israel. Either way, having a makeup artist on call doesn’t disqualify anyone from having an opinion.

The Harvard-educated Portman has spent ample time in Israel throughout her life and consistently makes her Israeli identity a focus in interviews. She has spoken excessively about her love of Israel and made it expressly clear that she is critical of some governmental policies and politicians, not Israel itself. In 2014, she adapted beloved Israeli writer Amos Oz’s book “A Tale Of Love And Darkness” into a movie which she starred in, directed, produced personally. It was shot in Israel, in Hebrew, and concerned the birth of the country in 1948.

In April, Portman courted massive controversy when she refused to accept the Israeli Genesis Prize, saying, “I did not want to appear as endorsing Benjamin Netanyahu, who was to be giving a speech at the ceremony.” She added that she is not a supporter of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. The prevailing criticism was that Portman should “stay in her lane” and “stick to acting.” One imagines that if she’d accepted the Israeli award alongside the country’s Prime Minister, she would not have been told to “quit it with the politics.”

Natalie Portman: proof a person can reasonably form an opinion on Israeli policies, even if that person anchored the worst-ever “Star Wars” movies.

Jenny Singer is the deputy lifestyle editor for the Forward. You can reach her at [email protected] or on Twitter @jeanvaljenny

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.