Blogger Jennifer Rubin Keeps Washington Post Job After Norway Gaffe

Paper Bends Over Backward to Accommodate Right-Wing Views

By Eric Alterman

Published August 24, 2011, issue of September 02, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The Washington Post got into a bit of a kerfuffle recently when its conservative blogger Jennifer Rubin put up a post attempting to assign blame to Islamic “jihadists” for the July 22 bombing in Oslo and then let the post stand for more than 24 hours. This despite the fact that it was widely reported during this period that the killer was, in fact, a blond-haired, blue-eyed conservative Christian.

The Post received so many complaints about Rubin that the paper’s ombudsman, Patrick Pexton, felt a need to interview her about her work habits. He came back believing that she had a “good defense”: “She is Jewish. She generally observes the Sabbath from sundown Friday until sundown Saturday; she doesn’t blog, doesn’t Tweet, doesn’t respond to reader e-mails.”

Were all of the above entirely consistent with the truth, it still would not have absolved the Post for failing to remove Rubin’s misguided musings. But as it happens, her explanation had almost as many holes in it as her journalism did. Sundown in Washington occurred July 22 at about 8:20 p.m., but a commenter on Rubin’s blog, posting at 5:53 p.m., informed her of her error. Another blogger who jumped to the same conclusion, Wired’s Spencer Ackerman, had his correction and apology up by 7:45 that evening. What’s more, Rubin put up four additional posts after her misrepresentation of the Oslo bombing, the final one punching in at 9:07 (though these could have been written earlier).

From a purely journalistic standpoint, Rubin’s actions entitle her to a stern rebuke and possibly job loss. Not only did she embarrass the paper with shoddy, ideologically motivated speculation, she then pretended she could not correct her mistake for religious reasons, which was clearly nonsense, as well. But for Jews, there are some special considerations here. As Ron Kampeas of JTA noted in his blog post on the controversy, pretending that “Jewish observance is an excuse when it clearly is not — well, it rankles. There’s way too long a history of Jews having to take risks to observe Shabbat for it to be used as a bad faith out.”

But the exploitation of the excuse of Jewish observance has historical roots, as well, inconvenient as it may be to admit. Recall the almost comically hysterical reaction to Philip Roth on the occasion of the publication of his small masterpiece, “Defender of the Faith.” in The New Yorker in 1959. (The story, which was reprinted in “Goodbye, Columbus,” published the same year, concerns a group of Jewish enlisted men who pretend to be let off duty to go to a Passover Seder and instead go out for Chinese food.) One reader responded to Roth, “With your one story, ‘Defender of the Faith,’ you have done as much harm as all the organized anti-Semitic organizations have done to make people believe that all Jews are cheats, liars, connivers.” A rabbi wrote to the Anti-Defamation League, asking: “What is being done to silence this man? Medieval Jews would have known what to do with him.”

I will leave Rubin’s relationship to the Sabbath to her own conscience. But I think we need to take note of this incident as an example of how profoundly skewed our media discourse is on behalf of right-wing supporters of Israel, however biased they may be. Think about it: Rubin is a neoconservative hired by the Post from Commentary because of, rather than despite, her unceasing defense of every action taken by Israeli’s conservative Likud government. She has even reported for the Post while accepting a free trip to Israel from the Emergency Committee for Israel.

Is it even possible to imagine a mainstream newspaper in America hiring a Muslim — even a moderate Muslim — to give vent to his or her ill-informed opinions and prejudices about Jews and Israel? Can you imagine a writer simply assuming, without evidence, that the perpetrator of some heinous crime must be a Jew and then pleading that the false information could not be corrected because he or she had to observe Ramadan? To ask the question is to answer it. Let’s keep playing this game. Now try to imagine an influential liberal magazine whose longtime owner/editor-in-chief regularly referred to Jews as “violent, fratricidal, unreliable, primitive and crazed” and “barbarian,” as well as “cruel, belligerent, intolerant” people who “behave like lemmings” and only “feign outrage” over the mass murder of their people? Well that’s the kind of thing Martin Peretz, owner and editor-in-chief of The New Republic, has routinely written about Arabs for decades. And what if a respected commentator in the Arab-American community called our temples and synagogues ”breeding grounds for militants”?

What if he were invited to speak to a convention of a central Arab-American organization and announced, ”I worry very much, [about] the presence, and increased stature, and affluence, and enfranchisement of American Jews”? Well, that’s what Daniel Pipes said to the American Jewish Committee in 2002, though, of course, he was speaking about Arabs, not Jews.

Personally, I think all American Jews ought to be shamed by comments like those and shamed, as well, by the generalized silence in the organized Jewish community toward those who purposely generate hatred toward Muslims and Arabs of all stripes. But I also think it’s long past time that everyone recognize what a profound disadvantage these people are in when it comes to America’s media debate. There is literally no one on the other side of this issue in a respected news source who comes close to matching the bile of a Rubin, a Peretz, a Pipes and many, many others. Almost no mainstream pundits sympathize with the Palestinian position at all. Of course, to point this out — while at the same time noticing that a great many pundits in the media happen to be Jewish and darn few are Muslim — is to invite charges of anti-Semitism and/or Jewish self-hatred. If you ask me, allowing the haters to rant and rave as they do without allowing any dissident voices into our debate does far more damage to both the cause of Israel and the honor of American Jews.

Eric Alterman is a CUNY Distinguished Professor of English and Journalism at Brooklyn College and also writes a column for The Nation.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • The rose petals have settled, and Andi has made her (Jewish?) choice. We look back on the #Bachelorette finale:
  • "Despite the great pain and sadness surrounding a captured soldier, this should not shape the face of this particular conflict – not in making concessions and not in negotiations, not in sobering assessments of this operation’s achievements or the need to either retreat or move forward." Do you agree?
  • Why genocide is always wrong, period. And the fact that some are talking about it shows just how much damage the war in Gaza has already done.
  • Construction workers found a 75-year-old deli sign behind a closing Harlem bodega earlier this month. Should it be preserved?
  • "The painful irony in Israel’s current dilemma is that it has been here before." Read J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis of the conflict:
  • Law professor Dan Markel waited a shocking 19 minutes for an ambulance as he lay dying after being ambushed in his driveway. Read the stunning 911 transcript as neighbor pleaded for help.
  • Happy birthday to the Boy Who Lived! July 31 marks the day that Harry Potter — and his creator, J.K. Rowling — first entered the world. Harry is a loyal Gryffindorian, a matchless wizard, a native Parseltongue speaker, and…a Jew?
  • "Orwell would side with Israel for building a flourishing democracy, rather than Hamas, which imposed a floundering dictatorship. He would applaud the IDF, which warns civilians before bombing them in a justified war, not Hamas terrorists who cower behind their own civilians, target neighboring civilians, and planned to swarm civilian settlements on the Jewish New Year." Read Gil Troy's response to Daniel May's opinion piece:
  • "My dear Penelope, when you accuse Israel of committing 'genocide,' do you actually know what you are talking about?"
  • What's for #Shabbat dinner? Try Molly Yeh's coconut quinoa with dates and nuts. Recipe here:
  • Can animals suffer from PTSD?
  • Is anti-Zionism the new anti-Semitism?
  • "I thought I was the only Jew on a Harley Davidson, but I was wrong." — Gil Paul, member of the Hillel's Angels. http://jd.fo/g4cjH
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.