What Will Help on Guns?

Editorial

getty images

Published April 24, 2014, issue of May 02, 2014.
  • Print
  • Share Share
  • Multi Page

A troubling new play at Manhattan’s Public Theater begins with an eerie scene of a girl laid out on a table as if in a mortuary, and ends with an enigmatic question. For the 90 minutes in between, the audience witnesses what happens after a disturbed former student opens fire in the crowded library of his high school, initiating the kind of deadly rampage that has sadly become a familiar feature of contemporary American life.

The play is called “The Library.” It echoes like the latest school shooting.

We’re not giving away any of playwright Scott Z. Burns’ script by recounting its closing words. In matter-of-fact tones, several characters describe in detail the three different firearms used with abandon by the gunman. Then Chloe Grace Moretz, the brilliant leading actress who plays a student survivor of the shooting, says: “You’re left with only your scars to mark the void. All you could choose to do is go on, or not.”

To which her character’s mother replies: “Did that help?”

There, with dramatic economy, Burns lays it out: the instruments of carnage; the stark emotional toll, the challenge to the audience. Will this drama, inspired partly by the 1999 shootings at Columbine High School, help galvanize the public? Will the fact that it all seems so familiar finally rouse our civic anger?

If Columbine didn’t bring about sensible, national gun safety laws, and Virginia Tech didn’t, and Gabrielle Giffords’ near death-experience didn’t, and even Newtown didn’t, what will?

The recent announcement that former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg plans to spend $50 million this year building a nationwide grassroots network to motivate voters who feel strongly about curbing gun violence may provide the answer. Bloomberg is certainly asking the right question: Why should one organization, the National Rifle Association, exercise such overwhelming political power when it reflects only a fraction of American public opinion?

“They say, ‘We don’t care. We’re going to go after you,’” Bloomberg said of the NRA in an interview with The New York Times, explaining how the lobby threatened to attack politicians who refused to go along with its pro-gun agenda. So, Bloomberg added, “We’ve got to make them afraid of us.”

Bloomberg’s money, welcome and necessary though it is, represents only one part of the answer, however. It will be effective only if it is matched in passion and raw determination by voters and activists willing to put aside other causes to focus for once on this.

The nurses, physicians and other health care professionals who have mobilized in the past to push for legislation helpful to their practices and pocketbooks need to make it clear that senseless gun violence in this country is a serious public health concern.

The activists who have successfully expanded the definition of civil rights — from the right to board a public bus in a wheelchair to the right of gay men and lesbians to marry —must see gun safety as a civil right, too. The right to public safety. The right to know that if they step into a school or a store or a bar, the person at the next table or at the checkout line isn’t carrying a concealed weapon.

After the latest shootings at Jewish institutions in Kansas City, this needs to leap to the top of the Jewish communal agenda, too.

The elected officials so adept at reading public opinion polls should recognize that an overwhelming majority of Americans — including members of the NRA — favor expanding the background check system for gun buyers at the state and national level, the key aim of the Bloomberg initiative, called Everytown for Gun Safety. That’s the name of the new umbrella organization incorporating two groups that Bloomberg had been funding: Mayors Against Illegal Guns and Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, which started as a Facebook page after the Newtown shootings in December 2012 and now has chapters in all 50 states.

It’s the mothers — including Jewish mothers — who really need to mobilize.

We’re not being sexist here. Just strategic.

Kristin A. Goss, an associate professor of public policy and political science at Duke University, wrote a book after Columbine asking why America hadn’t developed a strong gun control movement. She analyzed other life-and-death movements and found “three common elements: funding from wealthy patrons, incremental strategies that delivered momentum-building victories and maternal calls to action,” she wrote recently in The New York Times. In other words: money, momentum and moms.

Maternal calls to action, you may remember, spurred a movement to curb drunk driving that has had demonstrable, life-saving results. You can see the same passion to hold together families and communities when reading the first-person stories on the Moms Demand Action website: stories of the infuriating waste of human life brought on by people who should not have had access to guns.

Men still hold the preponderance of political power in this country and so it may well be up to women to become the swing vote for this cause. Two Jewish women have lent their traumatized voices to this campaign — Giffords and Veronique Pozner, mother of the only Jewish child killed in the Newtown massacre — and yet have little to show for their heroic efforts. Twice as many states have loosened gun laws than approved restrictions since Newtown.

In “The Library,” we learn that the murderer purchased his weapons at a garage sale and at a Wal-Mart store. Could the problem be any more dramatically clear?


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.