AIPAC Hits Capitol Hill With Hard Line Message on Palestinian Authority

By Nathan Guttman

Published May 23, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

In a break from its stance in recent years, the pro-Israel lobby is pursuing a hard-line agenda toward the Palestinian Authority at its annual conference, as 10,000 activists prepare to carry its message to Capitol Hill.

The lobbying agenda of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee traditionally includes two elements over the past several years — ensuring foreign aid to Israel and tightening sanctions against Iran in order to block its nuclear ambitions — that are once again being stressed this year.

But at its current annual conference, which runs through Tuesday, May 24, the third lobbying issue is directed at the P.A. Once depicted by Israel’s supporters, and by Israel itself, as Israel’s negotiating partner for peace, the P.A. is now portrayed as the key obstacle to progress. Specifically, AIPAC is taking issue with two recent moves made by P.A. President Mahmoud Abbas — his insistence on bringing the issue of Palestinian statehood to a vote at the United Nations General Assembly in September, and the decision to enter a unity government with Hamas without insisting that the group, which currently governs Gaza, recognize Israel and renounce terror.

AIPAC delegates, as they embark on lobbying meetings on Tuesday, will ask their representatives to support resolutions in the House and Senate that reaffirm the American opposition to a unilateral Palestinian move at the U.N. and threaten the P.A. with cutting American aid if it moves forward with the Hamas unity agreement.

The House resolution, co-sponsored by Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia and Democratic Minority Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland, urges the administration “to consider suspending assistance to the Palestinian Authority pending a review of the unity agreement.”

The administration has yet to take an official position regarding the future of American aid to the P.A.

In the past, AIPAC has supported American aid to the P.A., although it pushed Congress to adopt legislation restricting the flow of American taxpayer dollars to elements involved in terror within the Palestinian government. Leaders of AIPAC have met regularly with Abbas and with his prime minister, Salam Fayyad. Now, the break with the Palestinian leadership seems deeper than ever.

In his speech May 23 at the AIPAC policy conference, the group’s executive director, Howard Kohr, accused Abbas of making “bad choices” and said Abbas has “traveled a long and winding path, taking him farther and farther away from the neighbor he needs to sit down and negotiate with.” Kohr tasked AIPAC activists with the need to block Abbas, declaring, “It is up to us to create resistance.”

At the same time, Kohr struck a cautious note when it came to the dispute that erupted between Benjamin Netanyahu’s government and the Obama administration. In a speech viewed as the lobby’s annual declaration of priorities, the AIPAC leader noted the importance of containing differences between the United States and Israel. “It is so important that America and Israel work out whatever differences arise between them privately and, when tensions do arise, that the leaders work together to close those gaps,” Kohr said, adding immediately, “The president’s speech to us yesterday reflected just such an effort to close those gaps.”

Still, Kohr seemed to put the onus of maintaining no daylight between the two countries mainly on the side of Obama. He called on the United States to remain an honest but not evenhanded broker for Middle East peace. “When the United States is evenhanded,” he said, “Israel is automatically at a disadvantage.”

Contact Nathan Guttman at guttman@forward.com


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.