AIPAC Hits Capitol Hill With Hard Line Message on Palestinian Authority

By Nathan Guttman

Published May 23, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

In a break from its stance in recent years, the pro-Israel lobby is pursuing a hard-line agenda toward the Palestinian Authority at its annual conference, as 10,000 activists prepare to carry its message to Capitol Hill.

The lobbying agenda of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee traditionally includes two elements over the past several years — ensuring foreign aid to Israel and tightening sanctions against Iran in order to block its nuclear ambitions — that are once again being stressed this year.

But at its current annual conference, which runs through Tuesday, May 24, the third lobbying issue is directed at the P.A. Once depicted by Israel’s supporters, and by Israel itself, as Israel’s negotiating partner for peace, the P.A. is now portrayed as the key obstacle to progress. Specifically, AIPAC is taking issue with two recent moves made by P.A. President Mahmoud Abbas — his insistence on bringing the issue of Palestinian statehood to a vote at the United Nations General Assembly in September, and the decision to enter a unity government with Hamas without insisting that the group, which currently governs Gaza, recognize Israel and renounce terror.

AIPAC delegates, as they embark on lobbying meetings on Tuesday, will ask their representatives to support resolutions in the House and Senate that reaffirm the American opposition to a unilateral Palestinian move at the U.N. and threaten the P.A. with cutting American aid if it moves forward with the Hamas unity agreement.

The House resolution, co-sponsored by Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia and Democratic Minority Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland, urges the administration “to consider suspending assistance to the Palestinian Authority pending a review of the unity agreement.”

The administration has yet to take an official position regarding the future of American aid to the P.A.

In the past, AIPAC has supported American aid to the P.A., although it pushed Congress to adopt legislation restricting the flow of American taxpayer dollars to elements involved in terror within the Palestinian government. Leaders of AIPAC have met regularly with Abbas and with his prime minister, Salam Fayyad. Now, the break with the Palestinian leadership seems deeper than ever.

In his speech May 23 at the AIPAC policy conference, the group’s executive director, Howard Kohr, accused Abbas of making “bad choices” and said Abbas has “traveled a long and winding path, taking him farther and farther away from the neighbor he needs to sit down and negotiate with.” Kohr tasked AIPAC activists with the need to block Abbas, declaring, “It is up to us to create resistance.”

At the same time, Kohr struck a cautious note when it came to the dispute that erupted between Benjamin Netanyahu’s government and the Obama administration. In a speech viewed as the lobby’s annual declaration of priorities, the AIPAC leader noted the importance of containing differences between the United States and Israel. “It is so important that America and Israel work out whatever differences arise between them privately and, when tensions do arise, that the leaders work together to close those gaps,” Kohr said, adding immediately, “The president’s speech to us yesterday reflected just such an effort to close those gaps.”

Still, Kohr seemed to put the onus of maintaining no daylight between the two countries mainly on the side of Obama. He called on the United States to remain an honest but not evenhanded broker for Middle East peace. “When the United States is evenhanded,” he said, “Israel is automatically at a disadvantage.”

Contact Nathan Guttman at guttman@forward.com


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • "Orwell would side with Israel for building a flourishing democracy, rather than Hamas, which imposed a floundering dictatorship. He would applaud the IDF, which warns civilians before bombing them in a justified war, not Hamas terrorists who cower behind their own civilians, target neighboring civilians, and planned to swarm civilian settlements on the Jewish New Year." Read Gil Troy's response to Daniel May's opinion piece:
  • "My dear Penelope, when you accuse Israel of committing 'genocide,' do you actually know what you are talking about?"
  • What's for #Shabbat dinner? Try Molly Yeh's coconut quinoa with dates and nuts. Recipe here:
  • Can animals suffer from PTSD?
  • Is anti-Zionism the new anti-Semitism?
  • "I thought I was the only Jew on a Harley Davidson, but I was wrong." — Gil Paul, member of the Hillel's Angels. http://jd.fo/g4cjH
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • That sound you hear? That's your childhood going up in smoke.
  • "My husband has been offered a terrific new job in a decent-sized Midwestern city. This is mostly great, except for the fact that we will have to leave our beloved NYC, where one can feel Jewish without trying very hard. He is half-Jewish and was raised with a fair amount of Judaism and respect for our tradition though ultimately he doesn’t feel Jewish in that Larry David sort of way like I do. So, he thinks I am nuts for hesitating to move to this new essentially Jew-less city. Oh, did I mention I am pregnant? Seesaw, this concern of mine is real, right? There is something to being surrounded by Jews, no? What should we do?"
  • "Orwell described the cliches of politics as 'packets of aspirin ready at the elbow.' Israel's 'right to defense' is a harder narcotic."
  • From Gene Simmons to Pink — Meet the Jews who rock:
  • The images, which have since been deleted, were captioned: “Israel is the last frontier of the free world."
  • As J Street backs Israel's operation in Gaza, does it risk losing grassroots support?
  • What Thomas Aquinas might say about #Hamas' tunnels:
  • The Jewish bachelorette has spoken.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.