Skip To Content

It’s Jewish Judge vs. Jewish Judge: Posner Bad-Mouths Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan

Federal judges tend to have a strict sense of professionalism, commenting on and overruling each others’ verdicts with all due respect. But Richard Posner, the crotchety and loquacious jurist on the federal appeals court in Chicago, had no gumption about bad-mouthing his colleagues – even his fellow Jews — on the Supreme Court.

At a discussion hosted this month at a Chicago bookstore and filmed by C-Span, Posner didn’t mince his words. “I think the Supreme Court is awful. I think it’s reached a real nadir. Probably only a couple of the justices, Breyer and Ginsburg, are qualified. They’re okay, they’re not great,” he said.

Breyer is one of the Court’s lower-key figures, but it’s certain that Posner’s comment wouldn’t sit right with the most ardent “RBG” fans. And what about the Court’s other Jewish member, Elena Kagan? She was the dean of Harvard Law School, after all.

Posner blamed the situation on politics and the presence of law clerks, who do the grunt work of judging by writing opinions for their bosses.

“Of course, the politicians don’t care about the quality of judges. They’re politicians… They’re not interested in having good judges,” he said.

According to Posner, the assistance of good clerks leads politicians to look past judicial qualifications and make other considerations in appointing judges. “Well, we’re appointing this person because he or she is of a particular race, or comes from a special part of the country, or this or that, or is liberal or is conservative,” he said, imagining their thought process.

“There are all these brilliant law clerks working, so their opinions will be all right, because the law clerks will write them… That’s a very serious deficiency in our system, and there are zillions more,” he added.

One of the leading scholars on the federal bench, Posner teaches law at the University of Chicago and has written acclaimed works such as “Sex and Reason. He has adopted a moderate conservative tack in his role on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers the Midwest.

This is not the first time that he’s directed harsh words at the justices. Before Antonin Scalia died this February, Posner ran an op-ed in The New York Times that blasted the late jurist over his dissents to Court decisions that established marriage equality as the law of the land.

“Justice Scalia seems to want to turn the Constitution upside down when it comes to government and religion,” Posner wrote. “His political ideal verges on majoritarian theocracy.”

Contact Daniel J. Solomon at [email protected] or on Twitter @DanielJSolomon


Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.