Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
News

Is ‘Star Wars’ a Sinister Jewish Plot To Promote Diversity? ‘Alt-Right’ Says Yes.

White supremacists are calling for a boycott of the latest “Star Wars” movie as evidence of a Jewish plot to foist racial diversity on whites, even as some on the “alt-right” say they watch the film and root for the evil Empire.

“(((Star Wars))) Is Anti-White Social Engineering,” a Reddit user named GenFrancoPepe posted in a forum for the “alt-right,” a hard-line white nationalist movement. The triple parenthesis, known as an “echo,” is a way anti-Semites online call attention to Jewish names or perceived Jewish influence.

The evidence: “Alt-right” writers point out the multiracial makeup of the stars in the new film, the female starring role, and that Jewish producers and writers were involved. Criticism of the film evokes one of the central tropes of modern anti-Semitism, envisioning a Jewish cabal promoting multiculturalism to suit its own nefarious goals — at the expense of an embattled “white civilization.”

One writer at the neo-Nazi site Infostormer “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story,” slated to be released this month, a product of “anti-white hate” produced by Jews. “Nearly all of the major characters are non-Whites and the main character is an empowered White female,” the post reads. “This film should be boycotted.”

“Remember to boycott all Star Wars movies!” another writer chimed in.

The original “Star Wars” films, released in the 1970s and ’80s, envision a universe where rag-tag rebel forces face off against an evil empire. The films draw from Nazi-era imagery and are widely seen as being about the dangers of fascism.

This year, actors and writers involved in the franchise have been drawn into a galaxy closer to home: U.S. politics. Mark Hamill, who played Luke Skywalker, criticized President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks as a “who’s-who of really despicable people.”

In the wake of Trump’s win, two writers of the new movie adopted the symbol of “Star Wars: Rebellion” as their own battle cry.

Writer Chris Weitz tweeted: “Please note that the Empire is a white supremacist (human) organization.” Gary Whitta, another writer, tweeted, “Opposed by a multicultural group led by brave women.”

This is not the first time the “alt-right” campaigned against “Star Wars.” When the previous film was released, in 2015, the movement rallied around the hashtag #BoycottStarWarsVII to protest the black actor cast in a leading role.

But for some conservative thinkers and others in the far right, the evil Darth Vader is the hero.

In 2002, when an earlier chapter of the “Star Wars” saga was released, The Weekly Standard’s Jonathan V. Last wrote a post called “The Case for the Empire,” in which he argued that Star Wars creator George Lucas “confused the good guys with the bad.” “The deep lesson of ‘Star Wars’ is that the Empire is good,” he wrote.

Earlier this month, Steve Bannon, whose website Breitbart News is a platform for the “alt-right,” compared himself to the most famous villain of the “Star Wars” franchise. “Darkness is good… Dick Cheney. Darth Vader. Satan. That’s power,” Bannon said in a Hollywood Reporter interview.

Some members of the “alt-right” said they wouldn’t boycott “Star Wars.” Instead they would watch the film — and cheer on the Empire.

“If you’re annoyed by their allegories then don’t watch it. If you’re like me you’ll pirate it at some point and fantasize about being a stormtrooper,” one commenter on Reddit said.

The commenter continued: “Am I the only one who thought the Empire in ‘Star Wars’ was really cool? Kids watching ‘Star Wars’ are going to fantasize about the bad guys and buy toys of the bad guys and the narrative embedded in the film will be totally lost on them.”

On the same thread, another “alt-right” member weighed in: “We know which side we prefer. Always buy the Empire Legos. Always root for Hitler. Always retell the story your own way.”

Contact Sam Kestenbaum at kestenbaum@forward.com or follow him on Twitter, @skestenbaum

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version