Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

The Case of Jacob Goldberg v. Father Christmas

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Sir, it says here that you deliver toys to ALL the good boys and girls. Is that correct?

Claus: Yes, but it’s not like it’s a contract. It’s just…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: It does use the word “ALL” doesn’t it?

Claus: Yes, it does.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: In fact, you don’t actually deliver toys to all the good boys and girls, do you?

Claus: Well…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: You don’t do that, do you?

Claus: No. No I don’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Mr. Claus, on the night of December 24, 2003, you didn’t deliver any toys to little Jacob [pointing to plaintiff]. Isn’t that right?

Claus: I can’t really remember, I mean there are millions of kids…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Mr. Claus, I put before you what has been marked as Plaintiff’s Exhibit 32. Do you recognize that?

Claus: Yes.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Could you tell us what it is?

Claus: It’s an excerpt from our master list of all the good children who had toys delivered to them on the night of December 24, 2003.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: And the excerpt includes all last names beginning with the letters “Gol,” isn’t that right?

Claus: Yes.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: And Jacob’s last name isn’t there, is it?

Claus [thumbing through exhibit]: No, it isn’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: You have no reason to doubt the accuracy of your own list, do you?

Claus: No. We’re pretty good about those things.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: So, in fact, based on Exhibit 32, you have no reason to believe that any toys were delivered to little Jacob that night, do you?

Claus: No, I don’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Now, at any time prior to December 24, 2003, did you make any inquiry into whether Jacob had been a good boy?

Claus: Well, I’d have to see the lists.

Plaintiff’s Attorney [handing defendant another exhibit]: Feel free.

Claus [thumbing through exhibit]: No. It appears that we did not.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: So at the time you skipped over Jacob’s house, you had no idea, one way or the other, whether Jacob had been naughty or nice?

Claus: No, I didn’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: You didn’t even bother to ask.

Defense Attorney: Objection.

Judge: Sustained.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Sir, no one with Jacob’s last name got any toys that night, did they?

Claus: Can I see the other list?

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Well, you don’t have to look at the list to know that you’ve never delivered toys to anyone named “Goldberg,” do you?

Claus: I don’t…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: I’ll rephrase it. You’ve never delivered toys to anyone with the last name Goldberg, have you?

Claus: No. No, I haven’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: In fact, you’ve never even bothered to check whether any boy or girl with the last name Goldberg was naughty or nice, have you?

Claus: No.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: And that’s because despite your promise to deliver presents to ALL boys and girls, you don’t give anything to Jewish children, do you?

Claus: Well, they don’t believe in me. Why should I?

Plaintiff’s Attorney: You exist, don’t you?

Claus: Yes, I exist. Of course I exist.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: And you exist even if some children don’t believe in you, isn’t that right?

Claus: Yeah, of course.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: So, it doesn’t really matter if a child doesn’t believe in you, does it?

Claus: Well, why should I break my neck…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Before delivering presents to the Christian children, do you ever check and see if they believe in you?

Claus: No, that would be next to imp…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: You don’t, do you?

Claus: No, I don’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: But Jewish children are automatically excluded from getting presents, aren’t they?

Claus: Yes.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Mr. Claus, did it ever occur to you that little Jacob Goldberg might not be Jewish?

Claus: Oh, Christ.

Adam Grace is an attorney and the father of two children who have been very good.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.